Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha  I think it depends on what BB revealed to the Commish. If BB said he only taped opponents once or twice, then he might be in trouble. I say might because I know of no proof that BB directed Walsh to make these newly revealed tapes. |
I think that this could end up being the big hammer issue. We've all probably been told since we were children, if you did something wrong, tell the truth or the punishment will be much worse. Kinda like the Vick issue. If BB had said they only did one or two games and lied about it, I think the comish will come down extremely hard on not only him, but the entire team.
If I was in his shoes, I would have contacted Walsh right after the first incedent and paid a very, very heafty price for those tapes. And, even if BB didn't order the tapes to be made, wouldn't he still be guilty by association? Just like in the regular world, if you jack up some customer/associate the boss of the company is going to catch some hell too. I just don't know if it will be BB, or some other high officail in the Pats FO.