bailey or taylor

Pages : 1 [2]

cpayne5
04-27-2004, 05:48 PM
it wouldn't have been Bailey/2nd rd/Rb committee.

it could have been Bailey/Taylor (we still had that #5 pick)/ and a RB picked in round 2

closer, but I am still happy with what he have instead
Oversight. Forgot to add another '/' in there. My apologies.

Ghost
04-27-2004, 06:02 PM
I say without hesitation TAYLOR, I think taylor is a apecial kind of player, I do not think that of bailey, he's good not great, I expect taylor to be great.

My thoughts exactly. Someone will probably bite my head off for saying this, but I think Bailey is overrated just a little bit. Taylor should be better in terms of his impact on any given game.

SmootSmack
04-27-2004, 06:21 PM
I think Canes is right when he says that right now Bailey is the better player. Taylor it appears will have a remarkable career. But BAiley is a proven pro-bowler. As for him having a bad year last year, keep in mind he played with a broken wrist most of the season and yet he never missed a game or even practice

skinsfanthru&thru
04-27-2004, 06:37 PM
as far as playmaking ability i gotta go with taylor. whereas with bailey, u knew he did his job when he wasn't mentioned in a highlight reel. but i'd easily take our current lineup over bailey being here when he didn't want to be and no perinnial probowl running back in portis. plus i honestly think that if bailey had stuck around it would have increased the odds of us drafting winslow or trading down to get a d-lineman and possibly stephen jackson or kevin jones.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum