Steve Smith Or Santana Moss?

Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 5 6

J DIZZLE
01-22-2006, 02:22 PM
1. I think Moss is better because he has abilty to go after the ball instead of just getting open.

2 I think might have a lil more strenth then Brunell but Brunell is still more of a pro

The reson Gibbs will not out MOss back there is because if you remember Darell Green. got injured returning punt gibbs never did it again

and i agree

Pocket$ $traight
01-22-2006, 02:30 PM
1. I think Moss is better because he has abilty to go after the ball instead of just getting open.

2 I think might have a lil more strenth then Brunell but Brunell is still more of a pro

The reson Gibbs will not out MOss back there is because if you remember Darell Green. got injured returning punt gibbs never did it again

and i agree

Steve Smith doesn't have the ability to go get the ball? Have you ever seen him play?

I think you are talking about Delhomme in your second point. Delhomme has been to the Super Bowl. Brunell will never take a team there.

saden1
01-22-2006, 03:00 PM
I find the fact that a receiver with 2 1000 yard season in 5 season being considered the best receiver in the NFL laughable. Neither Moss nor Smith are elite receivers just yet. Lets talk when they both do it two years in a row. Better yet, three in a row.

cpayne5
01-22-2006, 03:09 PM
I find the fact that a receiver with 2 1000 yard season in 5 season being considered the best receiver in the NFL laughable. Neither Moss nor Smith are elite receivers just yet. Lets talk when they both do it two years in a row. Better yet, three in a row.
Who is the fastest guy in a race; the guy who holds the world record but is running 5th or the guy who is running the best race of his life and is in the lead?

The NFL has turned into a "what have you done for me lately" league, so I'd be hard pressed to say that Steve Smith and Santana Moss should not be considered elite receivers.

PorterHouse
01-22-2006, 03:48 PM
i think the reason that he had more yards is that they have a better line and they could go for the homerun ball more often. they are pretty equal in ability, i think Moss has better hands.

Dirtbag59
01-22-2006, 03:56 PM
Kerry Colbert & Ricky "I meant to retire 3 years ago" Proel? They have nothing to do with Smith's success.


Actually now that I think about it your right. Kerry Colbert only had 282 yards this past year (Patten had 226 yards and didn't even play the entire season). On top of that Smith didn't have a tight end type with the Panthers like the Redskins have with Cooley (yes I know hes an H-Back). Not to take anything away from Moss who is a fantastic player, but at this moment Smith is the best reciever in the NFL.

BigSKINBauer
01-22-2006, 04:24 PM
i hate smith's attitude but he is the best receiver right now and has been all year. I wouldn't take him over moss though.

itvnetop
01-22-2006, 06:15 PM
i love some moss, but steve smith is on another level this season. entire defenses are shifting their formations towards him, yet he still manages to get the ball and explode for more yards. there are no other weapons on offense besides smith and delhomme.

at least we have portis and cooley to help out brunell and moss, and i think our line is also better.

hurrykaine
01-22-2006, 07:20 PM
1. Santana
2. Yes, Smith is better cuz Delhomme is better than Brunell
3. Yes
4. No, Antonio Brown should return kicks if he's still on the team.

bigm29
01-22-2006, 07:21 PM
i love some moss, but steve smith is on another level this season. entire defenses are shifting their formations towards him, yet he still manages to get the ball and explode for more yards. there are no other weapons on offense besides smith and delhomme.

at least we have portis and cooley to help out brunell and moss, and i think our line is also better.
i doubt our line is better but w/e

moss and smith are both amazing, but i think moss is more of a team player, and he's already here, so i'll take him

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum