jbcjr14
02-10-2006, 02:24 PM
I think if anything there will be improvements to Fed Ex - like a retractable roof or something like that if it possible before they would build another stadium. Dan does want a Super Bowl and that stadium is perfect if they could get a roof on it TEMPORARILY!
saden1
02-10-2006, 02:51 PM
FedEx hasn't even been open for 10 years...not only that but Snyder invested a crap load of money renovating and adding to the Stadium. Last time I checked, the Skins debt ratio was atrocious. If Snyder is going to do anything with his money, he is going to pay down the money he already owes for buying the team and the stadium.
doxiechic12000
02-10-2006, 04:06 PM
Hey! I can see Waldo in that pic!
Master4Caster
02-10-2006, 06:20 PM
Hey! I can see Waldo in that pic!
Very funny. :lol:
As to the rumor, that can only come up when we have nothing else to talk about. After watching the turmoil with the Nationals stadium, does anyone really believe the DC Council will go thru that again, not to mention Mr. Snyder? (I call him "Mr." since he lured Joe Gibbs out of retirement.) RFK is in a pure residential neighborhood; no place for a 100,000 seat stadium, and the parking, and the crowd. This one ranks right down there with "TO is coming to the Redskins." Won't happen in your lifetime.
Besides, Fedex is a gold mine. No way will it go idle.
dmek25
02-10-2006, 07:03 PM
a friend of mine works for fox sports said no way that fed ex hosts a super bowl because of the amount of camara stands and the poor sight lines.and there is no way to a new stadium
Warpath
02-10-2006, 09:59 PM
Redskins use Fedex for 8 regular season games, 2 preseason games, draft day party, and the tent sale. I think Snyder let a few bands play there last season. But as a whole it sits there unused for most of the year. Fedex is defniitely a cash cow or they would have more events there. With the 10 home games times 93,000 people is $$$.
Just remember, We all love the redskins, but football is BIG BUSINESS. And theres a reason why the redskins are the most profitable.
steveo395
02-10-2006, 10:26 PM
Snyder added to this and this is why we are the top revenue team in the NFL and other than the Yankees in all of sports today.
redskins are the richest team in all of sports in the world http://www.forbes.com/lists/2005/30/300925.html
#2 is the Manchester United Soccer Team http://www.forbes.com/finance/lists/34/2005/LIR.jhtml?passListId=34&passYear=2005&passListType=Misc&uniqueId=340001&datatype=Misc
the yankees are like $300 million behind us http://www.forbes.com/finance/lists/33/2005/LIR.jhtml?passListId=33&passYear=2005&passListType=Misc&uniqueId=334613&datatype=Misc
Pocket$ $traight
02-10-2006, 10:35 PM
I have heard some whispers, but no articles or news stories that the Redskins may seek to build a new 100,000 seat football only stadium at RFK after the Nationals leave for their new stadium in 08.
Again, I have neither seen nor read any news stories nor articles related to this subject, I have only heard rumors concerning the subject so I don't know how true it is.
Are there any thoughts from anyone concerning such a potential scenario?
I for one have very mixed feelings if this ever happens.
FedEx is just starting to finally gain slowly but surely that homefield advantage that has been badly missed since the days of RFK.
FedEx while not the fanciest and best located of football stadiums is modern, newer and in terms of capacity, luxury seats and club level attractions will allow the SKINs to financially top all teams in revenue for a long time to come. Why leave?
But if we know the Dan, he has high asperations. He seems like the type of guy that would want his own legacy and his own playpin, especially with the other area franchises either downtown (Wiz, CAPS) or heading downtown (NATS). He's going to want a piece of the action.
Once RFK is left, it will be interesting to see what happens.
Come on chief. Whoever spread that rumor obviously doesn't live around here. Haven't you seen how inept the D.C. city council is??? I will grow a second head before that happens.
They can't even build a baseball stadium. D.C. can't respond to a 911 call in less than 15 minutes, how the hell are they going to rebuild RFK? Case and point, regarding the baseball stadium, the D.C. city council is claiming that they saved the city all of this money. What they fail to tell people is that if they had committed when the issue was first brought up, they would have saved millions of dollars in construction fees.
Absolutely no way.
70Chip
02-11-2006, 01:16 AM
If Snyder is considering this, he should take a look at the nonsense that the DC City Council is engaged in with baseball and ask himself if that's how he wants to spend the next twenty years. Mr Cooke tried to build on the RFK site and he got consistent opposition fom the city, even though he was footing the bill. It's a quagmire. Besides, I thought FedEx really came into its own this year.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d5/Cooke_jack.jpg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Cooke_jack.jpg)
"By God stay clear of those damned DC politicians!"
Luxorreb
02-11-2006, 05:00 AM
Fed Ex is where the Redskins will be for some time. I think it's easier access, safer, ridiculous amount of land and parking compared to the RFK site. I would love to see them do what Chicago did with Soldier Field. Resurrect and modernize and enlarge it while keeping some architectural original pieces. It would be awesome. But just because I witnessed the magic that was RFK. Gibbs is back in town and that's good enough for me don't care if we ever get a Superbowl or move back to DC. GO REDSKINS!!!