saden1
02-14-2006, 05:27 PM
You know, anyone can say whatever they want but not too many people put their money where their mouth is. I put $120 ($2400 payout) on the Skins winning the super bowl next year and I am dead serious about how good I THINK this team will be next year.
Disclaimer: I won $750 this past weekend at a casino playing nickle slot machine. Came in with $20 and left with $758 (won 15K nickles :p). I could afford to put my money where my mouth is and still come out ahead :biggthump
My money is on the Skins baby! HAIL!
jswalker
02-14-2006, 05:38 PM
we did beat 5 of the teams ahead of us and should have beaten 8 of them. we will only be better next year and i think that dudes list sucks.
dblanch66
02-14-2006, 08:52 PM
He has his head up Peter King's ass.
70Chip
02-14-2006, 09:17 PM
The Giants are 9th best even though their quarterback and defense need to be better. (Translation: I love the Giants and I hope they win, even though rational analysis tells me they were a fluke this year.)
The Eagles will "bounce back" but they need more "playmakers". (Translation: I know perfectly well the Eagles are toast, but I have to slurp Donovan or the league will have my kneecaps broken.)
The Redskins were better than both at season's end, but he gets the "feeling" it will be difficult to repeat. (Translation: Dan Snyder has more money than me and Joe Gibbs isn't very quotable.)
dmek25
02-14-2006, 09:38 PM
dblanch, thats an awful big ass!
GoSkins!
02-14-2006, 09:46 PM
I'm glad there are jobs like "power ranking writer" out there for stupid people.
Except you Brud.........
dblanch66
02-15-2006, 12:25 AM
dblanch, thats an awful big ass!
HA!!! Sure is.
skinsttw
02-15-2006, 08:35 AM
Skins will play Steelers in next year's Super Bowl. Joe T was just one year early in his prediction.
firstdown
02-15-2006, 10:14 AM
The Giants are 9th best even though their quarterback and defense need to be better. (Translation: I love the Giants and I hope they win, even though rational analysis tells me they were a fluke this year.)
The Eagles will "bounce back" but they need more "playmakers". (Translation: I know perfectly well the Eagles are toast, but I have to slurp Donovan or the league will have my kneecaps broken.)
The Redskins were better than both at season's end, but he gets the "feeling" it will be difficult to repeat. (Translation: Dan Snyder has more money than me and Joe Gibbs isn't very quotable.)I will have to say that I don't think the Giants were a fluke. Ther D was not that bad just had injury problems toward the end of the year and their O should be just as good as last year. I think they will be the team that will chalange us this year for the division. I think Dallas takes a step back and the Eagles have a 8/8 record.
#56fanatic
02-15-2006, 11:13 AM
http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/story/9233607
Pete Prisco is retarded....he ranked the redskins 16th and he said the coaches won't be enough to overcome the talent issue....i didnt know we had a talent issue...he put us third in the division barely ahead of dallas
he made miami 8th...i know that they will probably be good, but if gus frerotte is your quarterback, your not going to get very far
Gus isn't going to be the #1 guy, they are going to trade Ricky for a QB. Miami was tough the second half of the season and had quality wins agains some good teams. The way they finished the year, they should be ahead of us. As alot of the teams that are ahead of us. They were better in a lot of areas. It doesn't mean anything right now, hell we could be ranked 32nd for all I care. The draft hasn't even happened yet. give it a rest.