The team to beat; REDSKINS

Pages : [1] 2 3 4

PhxRedSkin
05-20-2006, 11:22 AM
Without making any prognostications, we are the sleepy warrior. I started this thread because I didn't want to tag along with the thread that said our O line is crappy. We are the team to beat because, we hardly get any credit around the leauge. By the way I think our O line rocks! And I think Rabach is better than what some of you said about him. A good center is priceless commodity. Dockery pancakes, Brown squashes and Samuels is not overrated. And ummm Jansen.

Back to why we are the team to beat. We have the best coaching staff by far. We have Portis, Cooley, Moss, Patten, El, Lloyd and ahhhem on the other side Daniels, Griffin, Salave'a(monster), Wynn, Evans and now Carter! Marshall, Washington, McCune(soon to be a household name for badass!) and need I go into our secondary.....you get the point.
We are the team to beat because we have Joe Gibbs, chemistry, precision, execution, and commraderie. None of the other 31 teams have it.
Hail!

GTripp0012
05-20-2006, 11:31 AM
Our defense is downright scary. Seriously, if our playmakers and DT's stay healthy, we will be the defense feared by all. Offensively, we have versatility all over the place. Randle El, Cooley, a QB who can run, are enough to keep D's guessing. It has the makeup of a SB team. The one worry? Kicker.

SkinsLove24/7
05-20-2006, 12:19 PM
The one worry? Kicker.

I totally agree. This is going to be a gamble going into the season. The kicker can be a vital part of a team but a solid offense shold score whenever they are in the red zone so field goals should be at a minimum this year.

RobH4413
05-20-2006, 12:29 PM
I guess Mr. Novak isn't available anymore is he?

GTripp0012
05-20-2006, 12:37 PM
I totally agree. This is going to be a gamble going into the season. The kicker can be a vital part of a team but a solid offense shold score whenever they are in the red zone so field goals should be at a minimum this year.Hall is almost automatic from the redzone. His problem is beyond 40, his accuracy drops substancially. We need a guy who can hit consitently from the 40-55 range.

steveo395
05-20-2006, 01:33 PM
We dont need a kicker, we'll score a TD on every drive. Its the same reason why we don't need a punter. Hall can kick PATs so were fine.

JankySpanky80
05-20-2006, 03:20 PM
if Hall stays healthy we'll be fine, He's had the injury bug the last few seasons so lets all pray he is healthy and we won't have anything to worry about it

BigSKINBauer
05-20-2006, 05:24 PM
hall has been extremely unfortunate with injuries. Last year at the baltimore scrimmage he was perfect. I saw him kick atleast 40-50 times and he didn't miss one. HE was booting 60+ yard field goals consistantly. He started from 40 and worked his way back and didn't miss one. They were with one of the holding things though, not a place holder so maybe it was easier? He got injured and he dropped down. Lets hope for a healthy hall next year.

dmek25
05-20-2006, 05:44 PM
gtripp hit the nail right on the head.like any championship team,if the redskins can avoid major injuries,the pieces of the puzzle are all lined up for the redskins to have a very sucessful season

cpayne5
05-20-2006, 09:42 PM
Hall is almost automatic from the redzone. His problem is beyond 40, his accuracy drops substancially. We need a guy who can hit consitently from the 40-55 range.
I've posted the stats in the past (several times), and they show (overwhelmingly!) that he is nowhere near as bad as people claim. The arguments that he is a bad kicker are completely unfounded. If you want to see a BAD kicking situation, see the years before Jon Hall came to DC.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum