My 2006 TO Prediction [Archive] - Page 2 - Commanders Post at The Warpath


	Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum > My 2006 TO Prediction Log in My 2006 TO Prediction Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 MTK 07-21-2006, 12:29 PM Can you tell me why you aren't worried about TO when Dallas plays Washington? Check his last 2 games against the Redskins: 11/21/04: 2 catches, 24 yards, 1 TD 12/12/04: 6 catches, 46 yards, 0 TD Not much to worry about with Taylor all over him. 5RINGS 07-21-2006, 12:36 PM Check his last 2 games against the Redskins: 11/21/04: 2 catches, 24 yards, 1 TD 12/12/04: 6 catches, 46 yards, 0 TD Not much to worry about with Taylor all over him. Washington lost both of those games. Do you think the Eagles would have won with Keary Colbert playing instead of TO? Hail2theskins 07-21-2006, 12:52 PM Washington lost both of those games. Do you think the Eagles would have won with Keary Colbert playing instead of TO? thats not the point, the point is that TO is a nonfactor as according to his stats, he didnt produce much in those two games, whether or not we won is irrelevant to this 5RINGS 07-21-2006, 01:02 PM thats not the point, the point is that TO is a nonfactor as according to his stats, he didnt produce much in those two games, whether or not we won is irrelevant to this My point is that TO affects the way that you play Defence. Just like Taylor affects the way opponants play offence. How did you do against the Eagles without TO? Hmmmm. Two wins. Hail2theskins 07-21-2006, 01:05 PM not to undermine our wins but that was also with an injured mcnabb and a broken team due to TO... Hail2theskins 07-21-2006, 01:08 PM QB is a bigger issue than the wr corp cuz if your qb cant get the ball out then it doesnt matter whose receiving and a split team also isnt going to play well together and we were a better team last year than previous, so my point is there was more than just TO that led to two victories, you cant just say oh well TO wasnt there thats why the skins won MTK 07-21-2006, 01:14 PM Washington lost both of those games. Do you think the Eagles would have won with Keary Colbert playing instead of TO? The Eagles were also a Super Bowl team that year, the Redskins were 6-10. TO wasn't the main reason they won those games. The fact that they were a much better team is the reason why they won. TO had little impact on those games, just like what he'll have this year. MTK 07-21-2006, 01:16 PM My point is that TO affects the way that you play Defence. Just like Taylor affects the way opponants play offence. How did you do against the Eagles without TO? Hmmmm. Two wins. You're really oversimplifying things. The Eagles were a team in turmoil all year, McNabb was hurt, they had problems that went beyond simply missing their star WR. The Redskins were the better team last year, TO wouldn't have made a difference in either game. Hail2theskins 07-21-2006, 01:18 PM i like the way you put it better than i did matty, good work TheMalcolmConnection 07-21-2006, 01:23 PM The Eagles were also a Super Bowl team that year, the Redskins were 6-10. TO wasn't the main reason they won those games. The fact that they were a much better team is the reason why they won. TO had little impact on those games, just like what he'll have this year. Right. It just wasn't the fact that the Eagles were that damn good that year, it was the fact the Redskins were in a similar turmoil that year as well. Poor QB play, injuries to key players (Jansen), TO made no difference.