Factoring in fumbles is a little tricky.
Regarding TD/INT, I say 2:1 is a pretty safe estimate.
I say he'll probably be good for 5-6 lost fumbles.
TheMalcolmConnection
07-31-2006, 11:44 AM
Yeah what i have been trying to say, 3:1 isn't possible.
I think it's possible because he's going to have a few good games before he gets hurt.
hooskins
07-31-2006, 11:49 AM
I think it's possible because he's going to have a few good games before he gets hurt.
Well in that case, I am sure their are many QB's that have gone 7:1, but have played like 4 games and not been full time starters. I guess that is a whole different issue, but I gave my answer assuming that he starts a majority of the games.
TheMalcolmConnection
07-31-2006, 11:50 AM
I say give it 6 games as a measuring stick.
Monkeydad
07-31-2006, 12:32 PM
I say 3:1. He'll have more than one receiver to throw to this year, so with 6 possible places to throw the ball (3 WRs, TE, RB, FB)...he shouldn't have to hold onto the ball and scramble as much as last year. His fumbles should go down thanks to free agency and Al Saunders.
mooby
07-31-2006, 01:44 PM
I'm going with 2:1. Reason being, only one quarterback in the history of the game has had over 30 touchdowns and 10 interceptions, and that was Donovan McNabb in 2004. That's excluding fumbles of course, which i think Brunell will have his share of.
dmek25
07-31-2006, 02:04 PM
it seems like brunell had a crapload of fumbles last season. does anyone have the actual number? this offense is more of a 3 and 5 step and throw offense so there is a chance the number of fumbles goes down
That Guy
07-31-2006, 07:12 PM
1.5:1, but that's not an option, so i went 2:1, which is too high.
That Guy
07-31-2006, 07:13 PM
last year he had 23 TDs, 10ints and 11 fumbles (6 lost).
23:16 = 1.4375:1
Sammy Baugh Fan
07-31-2006, 07:16 PM
It will be low and short lived before Gibbs puts Jason Campbell in.
Brunell lasts 6 games max in my opinion.
"Campbell to Loyyd for a Redskins Touchdown!"
peace