That Guy
10-02-2006, 11:39 PM
lloyd had a fumble and 15 yard penalty, but i don't think it's quite enough to warrant a listing... yet. his blocking has been above and beyond for a WR.
frost had another shank and his inconsistancy has kept him in the hunt. his good plays are good, his bad plays are REALLY bad.
the defensive secondary is DEFINATELY on the list. they played relatively well this week, but rumph and wright aren't starters, they're spare parts. rogers has yet to step up and has looked outmatched. The scouting dept/FO also gets a lot of the blame for total lack of depth and failure to address it while letting existing quality depth (harris, bowen, stoutmire) walk.
so:
-current scapegoats: secondary/secondary depth, and the FO that allowed it.
-on notice: frost, lloyd.
redeemed: arch, carter (combined 6 tak, 1 ast, 2 sacks - enough for at least a one week reprieve. Carter got a good matchup vs the weakest link in the jag's OL and GW put in burns for coverage a LOT to help arch not look like burnt toast regularly, hence the reprieve and not the dismissal).
frost had another shank and his inconsistancy has kept him in the hunt. his good plays are good, his bad plays are REALLY bad.
the defensive secondary is DEFINATELY on the list. they played relatively well this week, but rumph and wright aren't starters, they're spare parts. rogers has yet to step up and has looked outmatched. The scouting dept/FO also gets a lot of the blame for total lack of depth and failure to address it while letting existing quality depth (harris, bowen, stoutmire) walk.
so:
-current scapegoats: secondary/secondary depth, and the FO that allowed it.
-on notice: frost, lloyd.
redeemed: arch, carter (combined 6 tak, 1 ast, 2 sacks - enough for at least a one week reprieve. Carter got a good matchup vs the weakest link in the jag's OL and GW put in burns for coverage a LOT to help arch not look like burnt toast regularly, hence the reprieve and not the dismissal).