I know this is pointless butGiantone 10-05-2006, 04:53 PM But Manning doesn't have Moss, Lloyd and Randal El.. OR Cooley... sorry dude.... Burrass, Toomer , Carter, Shocky,and Tiki goes out wide if you need him add in Brandon Jacobs,nope.:spank: RedskinRat 10-05-2006, 04:53 PM Depends who you ask: NFL.com - NFL Stats (http://www.nfl.com/stats/leaders/NFC/PYDS/2006/regular) Brunell ranked 7th, Manning E. ranked 11th. What else you got? RobH4413 10-05-2006, 04:53 PM The Giants D right now is in a state of flux but I wouldn't go out and bet the farm just yet .Their running D is very good the Pass D sucks .Right now in a shootout I'll take the Giants ,Manning is a better QB than Brunell is right now.:) Brunell- 77/118 (65.3%) 950 YDS 4TD 2INT Manning - 75/113 (66.4%) 893 YDS 8TD 5INT I'd say it's pretty close. hesscl34 10-05-2006, 04:54 PM Burrass, Toomer , Carter, Shocky,and Tiki goes out wide if you need him add in Brandon Jacobs,nope.:spank: Oh, let us not forget Porits and Sellers.... OH AND Patten.... there are so many I lose track.... :) RobH4413 10-05-2006, 04:55 PM heres a match-up Washington Redskins News, Scores, Schedule, Stats - Yahoo! Sports (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/teams/was/) Giantone 10-05-2006, 04:55 PM Brunell- 77/118 (65.3%) 950 YDS 4TD 2INT Manning - 75/113 (66.4%) 893 YDS 8TD 5INT I'd say it's pretty close. 2 of the int's were off the recievers .Brunell can't take the hits.Lets not forget what team has played who ? RobH4413 10-05-2006, 04:56 PM statistics don't mean much in first 4 games.... giants have only played 3... not really an argument if you ask me... RedskinRat 10-05-2006, 04:56 PM But you can't ignore the fact that you're the Giants....:laughing2 Giantone 10-05-2006, 04:57 PM Oh, let us not forget Porits and Sellers.... OH AND Patten.... there are so many I lose track.... :) Not even close ,Sellers ..Peter Sellers right?:) hesscl34 10-05-2006, 04:59 PM We use Sellers as a TE..... | |
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum