Can We Bench Brunell Now

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Mc2guy
10-15-2006, 08:47 PM
I'm all for benching Brunell simply to get a lot of ignorant people to shut the fuck up.

Maybe if we bench Brunell, put in JC and have the obvious results of having an inexperienced QB lead the team, people will recognize the slew of other problems facing us and realize that the QB position is the least of our worries. Worries like Travis Henry rushing for 178 yards, not picking off or pressuring a rookie QB with 3 starts, not giving CP more than 15 carries and blitzes so predictable a band of retarded puppies could defend them.

Some of us calling for Brunell to be benched are well aware of "other" team issue that must be dealt with. I have no delusions that a Rookie QB will step in a win a bunch of games right away. What you fail to recognize is that Brunell is not getting the job done at his position and I would much rather see JC get the experience now while the "other" issues are dealt with concurrently. That way hopefully the team is ready to rock and roll next season and beyond. If not, well you learned that you don't have the future QB in JC and we can draft or sign appropriately in the off-season.

BTW, I'm not ignorant and I won't STFU...at least not until we get to see JC under center for better of for worse. Maybe you should consider limiting your comments to your own opinions instead of insulting people. FWIW, having a different opinion does not make people ignorant.

redskins5044
10-15-2006, 08:47 PM
how much worse can it get with starting JC? we arent winning the SB this year and no SB is a failure for the skins this year. if he is our qb of the future he needs to learn by playing so now is a better time than never. but i dont think gibbs will start him this week v.s. the colts on the road but if we lose to the colts he will have a bye week to get JC ready for the home game v.s. dallas. if were 2-5 JC needs to be in there bottom line. if hes not gibbs needs someone to get his head out of his ass because brunell is not the future

Redskin
10-15-2006, 08:51 PM
Once again morons come out and pin a whole game on one man's shoulders, I must apluad that. I mean portis did have a really great game didnt he? Sean Taylor and Washington did drop pics that would have prevented points, but kno your right Brunnel should have been there to pick those balls off and run for Portis. I really think Redskins fans maybe the stupidest fans in football, fanwise this might have been the worste home game ever.

The only reason JC should start is not to improve the team, becuase that he will certainly not do, buit to give him experiance and for that we are talking about mayb the last 4-6 games depending how were doing i mean honestly we made an amazing run last year why not again?

BTW: the same posts were cerculating last year and i and a few others said we still had a chance so stop predicting armegedon

hooskins
10-15-2006, 08:53 PM
BTW: the same posts were cerculating last year and i and a few others said we still had a chance so stop predicting armegedon

Except last season we were 5-6 deep into the season, we are in a BIGGER hole in within the first 6 games. And most people agree with your asssesment of why JC should be in...

Redskin
10-15-2006, 08:55 PM
Im just an optimistic person I guess you will say but I personally feel it would still be early for Cambell, lets say the Colts game decides it becuase honestly i think we should think of our defense befor e our offense, who wouldent of been happy with 22 points last year?

Sheriff Gonna Getcha
10-15-2006, 08:56 PM
Redskin,

I understand your frustration, I'm just as frustrated, angry, etc. But, do you really need to say everyone is an idiot?

BTW, I dont think anyone is saying everything is Brunell's fault. A lot of people are also complaining (with good cause) about our defense if you hadn't noticed.

JGisLordOfTheRings
10-15-2006, 08:57 PM
Mark just cant get it done the way he needs to at this point and the D was extremely involved in that loss. Even if we won, I feel it would have been an ill gotten gain. We played like shit, and it shows.

jtm74
10-15-2006, 08:57 PM
I would much rather see JC start and lose every damn game left than mb start and finish 4-12 or 5-11.Its time to start thinking about next year

redskins5044
10-15-2006, 08:57 PM
brunell has no arm cant throw the deep ball to our wrs. the one good pass was to loyld. the offense is playing conservative because of brunells lack of arm. he has looked last year and the jax game because of moss. like i said if we lose next week it is time for JC.

Redskin
10-15-2006, 09:04 PM
brunell has no arm cant throw the deep ball to our wrs. the one good pass was to loyld. the offense is playing conservative because of brunells lack of arm. he has looked last year and the jax game because of moss. like i said if we lose next week it is time for JC.

I think it is reasonable to put cample in if we lose next week only becuase it will be a bye week and he can prepare, Im just afraid he will be another Patrick Ramsey :(

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum