The Brunell Thread (Merge)

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11]

chris36
11-12-2006, 10:39 PM
I hope that means, he knows he lost his job.

RedskinRat
11-12-2006, 10:41 PM
I hope that means, he knows he lost his job.

Something we can actually agree on.

skinsguy
11-12-2006, 10:45 PM
True. He hurt us more than helped. Sadly, the prettiest pass of the day came from ARE, even though it was knocked away.

What about the pass to BL?

Longtimefan
11-12-2006, 11:39 PM
I don't think where he looks is the problem, he has hit Cooley and Lloyd. We have no downfield attack, and Saunders appears to be giving up on even trying to make something happen downfield with this super conservative playcalling.



His playcalling is the way it is because he knows Brunell cannot throw the ball acurately downfield on a consistent basis. He therefore stays with what he believes Brunell can do, which is limited. Much different than the offense we saw his team run in KC.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha
11-12-2006, 11:42 PM
His playcalling is the way it is because he knows Brunell cannot throw the ball acurately downfield on a consistent basis. He therefore stays with what he believes Brunell can do, which is limited. Much different than the offense we saw his team run in KC.

I totally agree. Remember how Saunders was brought in because he was going to establish a vertical attack? Saunders said he was committed to establishing the deep threat, we got the receivers to make it happen, but Brunell can't/won't throw deep (save the very rare attempt).

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum