NM Redskin
11-27-2006, 07:54 PM
I think this is a lesson in the classic art of deception. All the article had to say was starter on the D to get everyone looking that way, when it was really on the other side of the ball. Who knows maybe it was Lavar and the other stuff got in there to give it creditability so it didn’t look like a Lavar was getting revenge.
That Guy
11-27-2006, 07:58 PM
I think this is a lesson in the classic art of deception. All the article had to say was starter on the D to get everyone looking that way, when it was really on the other side of the ball. Who knows maybe it was Lavar and the other stuff got in there to give it creditability so it didn’t look like a Lavar was getting revenge.
again, lavar would have no insight into this year's problems. he either got multiple people or it was springs.
JoeRedskin
11-27-2006, 08:12 PM
again, lavar would have no insight into this year's problems. he either got multiple people or it was springs.
When did Springs quote the article "word for word"? In his post game interview, it was clear he had read it. I get the feeling, however, that this article got passed around and was the subject of considerable discussion before the game.
CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR
11-27-2006, 08:30 PM
The player should just shut up and play ball like they did yesterday.
CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR
11-27-2006, 08:49 PM
Was a great article at least enjoyed reading it