Czaban Back on the Air

Pages : 1 [2] 3 4

SmootSmack
11-27-2006, 10:06 AM
The redskins ran the ball so much yesterday because that was about all they could do. The passing game was terrible and the game was low scoring so the game itself dictated run. Thats more of the reason the skins ran the ball than any back to redskin football baloney.

So you think they started the game hoping to air it out but when they couldn't they had no choice but to play smashmouth football??

hooskins
11-27-2006, 10:07 AM
Yeah especially a Gibbs led team. He really hates running the ball, even though he was preaching the emphasis on that all week.

Go figure.
Yeah I dont really get that, does he expect us to play like the Colts or the Eagles? Even the Colts went back to a running game last night. I really think he doesnt have any patience in general. This is in regards to coaching, performance, and scoring.

MTK
11-27-2006, 10:10 AM
The redskins ran the ball so much yesterday because that was about all they could do. The passing game was terrible and the game was low scoring so the game itself dictated run. Thats more of the reason the skins ran the ball than any back to redskin football baloney.

They ran the ball yesterday because #1 that's what Gibbs wanted to get back to, playing physical smashmouth ball. From last week's postgame presser that's what Gibbs was preaching, about getting back to playing their style of ball.

And #2 because they were running effectively.

I don't see why they should have to apologize for running the ball, with our OL and backs and given Campbell's inexperience, why would they not run the ball?

Big C
11-27-2006, 10:20 AM
i actually kinda like czaban, atleast he asks the tough questions that everyone else is afraid to ask

irish
11-27-2006, 10:24 AM
I dont think they expected to come out gunning like the Colts (they dont have the horses for that), and I certainly dont think they need to apologize for running the ball because it was working great. I think as the game progressed and it was apparent that JC could not hit the side of a barn and the run was working it was best to pound the ball with the run. In addition, the score was low and close so they could keep running, had they been down by 10 or 15 they would not have been able to run quite as much as they did as its hard to play comeback from a big defecit with a running game.

To me the reason the redskins had not been playing redskin football (besides the fact they brought in an offensive coordinator to implement a high flying offense with a 700 page playbook) is that they were often behind in games and had to pass the ball a lot in an effort to get back in the game. Yesterday they didnt have to do that so they could run.

Redskins_P
11-27-2006, 10:46 AM
Not that it matters, but did anyone hear Czaben's theory on who the "deep throat" was for the Skins????

irish
11-27-2006, 10:47 AM
Not that it matters, but did anyone hear Czaben's theory on who the "deep throat" was for the Skins????

Yes, he thinks its Springs.

Big C
11-27-2006, 10:53 AM
springs said in an interview it wasnt him, and that if it was him he would have said it to williams' face because they have that "good of a relationship"

he could be lying but i dont think it is him. im actually thinking it might be griffin

SmootSmack
11-27-2006, 10:56 AM
Yes, he thinks its Springs.

What led him to think that?

MTK
11-27-2006, 10:56 AM
At this point I'm tired of hearing names being thrown around, I mean c'mon Griffin? He was actually pretty ticked off over the whole thing when he was asked.

You have to think that the coaches have a pretty good idea of where this may have come from, and they are handling everything the way it should be handled, all internally.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum