Walt Harris to the Pro Bowl

Pages : 1 2 3 [4] 5

GTripp0012
01-26-2007, 11:29 PM
He had 8 ints and look at the other corners that had high ints.
Asante samual 10
champ bailey 10
rasheen mathis 8
Nnamdi asomugha 8
charles woodson 8
walt harris 8
chris mcalister 6

I dont think it's all luck. I know you guys want to tell yourselfs that being that you started mike rumph (are you serious) for part of the year.It's time to play everyones favorite game, "Which Player Doesn't Belong!!!" I'm your host GTripp, and now lets introduce you to our contestants today!

Seriously though, I think there is one player on that list thats very unlikely to be up there with those guys again. Two actually. Harris and Woodson.

On a completely unrelated note, welcome to the boards!

GTripp0012
01-26-2007, 11:33 PM
Except his '05 campaign was better than Wright's '06. They need to stop with the churn and burn mentality. Change for the sake of change does not work. I would like to know who decided that it would improve the team to drop Harris for an unknown entity.

Hell forget the question of switching Wright for Harris, what makes Rogers better than Harris? At least Harris can catch a ball that hits him in the hands.We needed the cap room. Bad.

Harris could have started here after Springs went down...Oh well. He wasn't better than Wright in 05, and he is awful against double moves, but with all the pass rush we got this year that wouldn't have hurt us, right?

Sheriff Gonna Getcha
01-27-2007, 12:16 AM
Were you paying attention when you were watching him?

Yup and he looked awful. He missed a ton of tackles, got burnt on double moves and on go routes by anyone faster than an offensive lineman. He looked absolutely silly in a game against the Eagles at FedEx (anyone remember that?). You, however, probably were not watching him last year, that is unless you are a closet Redskins fan.

SmootSmack
01-27-2007, 04:26 AM
Except his '05 campaign was better than Wright's '06. They need to stop with the churn and burn mentality. Change for the sake of change does not work. I would like to know who decided that it would improve the team to drop Harris for an unknown entity.

Hell forget the question of switching Wright for Harris, what makes Rogers better than Harris? At least Harris can catch a ball that hits him in the hands.

But it's not like Wright was a nobody. Plus, if I remember right, Harris (who, as mentioned, had a less than impressive 2005 season) left before we signed Wright and for the double the money we signed Wright to. So it's possible maybe, just maybe, that Wright just wanted to go. And it wasn't worth it to fight to keep him.

I don't know. I mean like I've said the move made perfect sense at the time but sometimes things just backfire. It's not a bad decision, just unfortunate results

anthony06
01-27-2007, 05:27 AM
As a niner fan who lives in dc there is one thing I think we can all agree on................ Mike rumph sucks! Everyone here keeps talking about wright, when in reality you should be focusing on how the depth of wright and harris would have been nice so rumph would have never seen the field. From a guy that watched every niner game and a handful of redskins games, Walt Harris was by far the 49ers best db last year(not saying a whole lot) and you definately could have used him.

P.S. I dont want to be trolling too hard but thanks for the B lloyd trade!

dmek25
01-27-2007, 07:08 AM
your welcome. and after you guys win 5 games next season, we will never hear from you again

Pocket$ $traight
01-27-2007, 10:00 AM
your welcome. and after you guys win 5 games next season, we will never hear from you again

At this moment, they look like they are in better shape than us for next year.

That being said, I think that G-dub is going to put a top 10 defense on the field next year. It may sound crazy now but what if someone said that we would have a top 3 D after the '03 campaign.

Pocket$ $traight
01-27-2007, 10:03 AM
We needed the cap room. Bad.

Harris could have started here after Springs went down...Oh well. He wasn't better than Wright in 05, and he is awful against double moves, but with all the pass rush we got this year that wouldn't have hurt us, right?

Did we really need it at the time? I thought we had about 3 million in space the whole year.

Anyway, it is too late to do anything about it now. Harris may make the Pro-bowl because he made plays this year but no one is afraid to throw at him and San Fran's D isn't exactly intimidating.

Master4Caster
01-27-2007, 10:16 AM
by a show of hands, how many wish here still played for the skins?

I wished we had that production here by Harris, or someone. Anyone.

I have a theory that a free agent's first year with a team is the toughest. Transition; adjustment; learning the system and all that. This year, I'm going to look at a free agent's stats from last year and discount it by a third. That's what I will expect from them in '07.

Curb your enthusiasm for those big signings of Freeney, Samuels or {fill in the blank}.

Rexi
01-27-2007, 04:11 PM
Yup and he looked awful. He missed a ton of tackles, got burnt on double moves and on go routes by anyone faster than an offensive lineman. He looked absolutely silly in a game against the Eagles at FedEx (anyone remember that?). You, however, probably were not watching him last year, that is unless you are a closet Redskins fan.You're right I didn't watch him last year. Maybe he was terrible I don't know, but you typed 2006 campaign (that would be THIS year) and this year he was fantastic.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum