Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back? [Archive] - Page 3


	Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum > Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back? PDA Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back? Pages : 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 TheMalcolmConnection 05-30-2007, 03:08 PM Honestly, I wouldn't put Gates over Cooley as the best OVERALL TE. Gates is a great receiver, but not the best blocker or after the catch. mmil12 05-30-2007, 03:08 PM Gonzo, Gates, Crumpler and Cooley should go to the pro bowl every year! There is no doubt in my mind. On another note, this just goes to show why we shouldn't trade away our second round draft picks. After all thats where we got Betts and Cooley! To great players for us. MTK 05-30-2007, 03:10 PM Gonzo, Gates, Crumpler and Cooley should go to the pro bowl every year! There is no doubt in my mind. On another note, this just goes to show why we shouldn't trade away our second round draft picks. After all thats where we got Betts and Cooley! To great players for us. Actually, we got Cooley in the 3rd round http://www.thewarpath.net/redskins-draft.htm But yeah, point taken about trading picks away. mmil12 05-30-2007, 03:13 PM Your right, my mistake. I just hope that Loyd plays well to open him and Moss up some more. If not, he needs to get benched for ARE who showed signs toward the end of last year! skinsfan_nn 05-30-2007, 03:29 PM Cooley is the man. And yes he's a blocking ,catching,running and of course hard hitting TE, TD machine. He will get his due respect this year at contract time. JDALY27 05-30-2007, 03:35 PM A FB can also be involved with the passing game. Saunders' offense doesn't use a true H-Back. Sellers is the Fullback and Cooley is the H-Back. Under Gibbs before Al Cooley was more of a TE than ever. He used to line up at the line of scrimmage much more often. Under Al Cooley is split out flexed more and seems to me that its just what an H-back is. Not a Fullback, Not a TE, Not a receiver.....H-BACK!!! Sorry AL, you use an H-BACK!! MTK 05-30-2007, 03:44 PM Sellers is the Fullback and Cooley is the H-Back. Under Gibbs before Al Cooley was more of a TE than ever. He used to line up at the line of scrimmage much more often. Under Al Cooley is split out flexed more and seems to me that its just what an H-back is. Not a Fullback, Not a TE, Not a receiver.....H-BACK!!! Sorry AL, you use an H-BACK!! I guess that will be news to Saunders. :doh: skinsfan_nn 05-30-2007, 03:50 PM Sellers is the Fullback and Cooley is the H-Back. Under Gibbs before Al Cooley was more of a TE than ever. He used to line up at the line of scrimmage much more often. Under Al Cooley is split out flexed more and seems to me that its just what an H-back is. Not a Fullback, Not a TE, Not a receiver.....H-BACK!!! Sorry AL, you use an H-BACK!! Glad you just schooled Al.......he's a TE JDALY27 05-30-2007, 04:31 PM Glad you just schooled Al.......he's a TE He's a Joe Gibbs H-back. That's what he was drafted for and that's what he is. AL Saunders can call him whatever he wants...... skinsfan_nn 05-30-2007, 04:42 PM He's a Joe Gibbs H-back. That's what he was drafted for and that's what he is. AL Saunders can call him whatever he wants...... Well daly let me tell you something. I was very lucky to play golf with CC 2 weeks ago. HIS EXACT WORDS AND I QUOTE, "THE SKINS WANT TO PAY ME LIKE AN AVERAGE TIGHT END"! Now that's NOT Joe or Al words. THAT WAS CC EXACT WORDS! SO IS HE STILL AN H-BACK IN YOUR MIND.....?