Scouts Inc. LB rankings

Pages : 1 [2]

SmootSmack
07-17-2007, 09:58 PM
can you really do that?

Really do what?

EARTHQUAKE2689
07-17-2007, 09:59 PM
Really do what?


Stop someone from making new threads until a set date.

SmootSmack
07-17-2007, 10:05 PM
Stop someone from making new threads until a set date.

Yeah, but I mean this is ultimately Matty's call if he thinks it's worth it.

I think it's pretty bush league to post the same exact thing in three different threads but it's not like it's all that different from writing "yup" "I agree" and "word" in three different threads.

I'm sure Ferrari knows better now

EARTHQUAKE2689
07-17-2007, 10:10 PM
Yeah, but I mean this is ultimately Matty's call if he thinks it's worth it.

I think it's pretty bush league to post the same exact thing in three different threads but it's not like it's all that different from writing "yup" "I agree" and "word" in three different threads.

I'm sure Ferrari knows better now


Yeah I saw that. I think 724 making fun of him was enough.

Pocket$ $traight
07-17-2007, 10:39 PM
I recall getting torched by everybody prior to '05.

How did that work out for the "experts"?

GTripp0012
07-17-2007, 11:47 PM
We WERE pretty horrible at LB last year. Bottom 1/4 and thats being nice.

However, the signing of Fletcher changes a LOT at LB, and the natural maturity of a certain second round draft pick will help us even further.

I'd predict top half this year. The LBs went from arguably our biggest weakness to the strength of the defense.

EARTHQUAKE2689
07-18-2007, 12:36 AM
We WERE pretty horrible at LB last year. Bottom 1/4 and thats being nice.

However, the signing of Fletcher changes a LOT at LB, and the natural maturity of a certain second round draft pick will help us even further.

I'd predict top half this year. The LBs went from arguably our biggest weakness to the strength of the defense.


Our entire defense was a weakness last year.

MTK
07-18-2007, 10:09 AM
I think this is a pretty fair assessment. With Fletcher and Washington we have two high quality LBs, the only unknown is Rocky. If he plays well our starting LB corps could be very good.

jdlea
07-18-2007, 10:11 AM
I think this is a pretty fair assessment. With Fletcher and Washington we have two high quality LBs, the only unknown is Rocky. If he plays well our starting LB corps could be very good.

Yeah, and based on their assessments, Washington would still qualify as "high quality." However, I'm nervous about him coming back from this hip surgery and how it what effect it will have on his play. I hope none, but I'm not too confident in that.

D'BOYZ
07-18-2007, 11:31 AM
I think 19th bassed on last years LB production, not really some great backups and the signing of Fletcher it's pretty accurate.

Dallas was #5 which I also thin kis fairly accurate we have very good starters in Ware, James, Ayondole and first round pick Spencer and amazing backups in 2nd rounder Burnett, 1st rounder B.Carpenter and Greg Ellis (I'm putting ellis as a Backup because I don't think he's 100% yet).

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum