Schneed10
07-30-2007, 01:07 PM
Not only are you beating a dead horse, You have beaten every horse that has ever died!
Move on...
Yeah that's basically what I was saying in the last paragraph of the very post you quoted.
TheMalcolmConnection
07-30-2007, 01:08 PM
Speaking of moving on, I think we should all take that advice...
Come on now, it's TRAINING CAMP. If you're not directly involved in this conflict, let's move along...
ArtMonkDrillz
07-30-2007, 01:11 PM
Probably most tragic is that you wasted your 4000th post on this issue.
Was hesscl34 a little full of herself? Probably. Could you have taken her down a peg without mention of "saddlebags"? Easily. You chose to be harsh, and have received harshness in return. What ye reap, ye also sow. Or something.
What's messed up is I was going to sit you two at the same table for my big Warpath party, and now I've got to redo the whole goddamned seating chart.
You just hate Schneed because he is a woman-hater. I bet you have issues with woman-haters and you try to keep them down.
RobH4413
07-30-2007, 01:11 PM
Yeah, but the comment was intended to cut her down off her high horse. So to an extent, it was meant to be distasteful and without tact, while at the same time at the core being an expression of opinion within the framework of the forum guidelines.
It was off topic as well...
Let me play devils advocate for a second..
W1HrsqI2sK0
okay.. that was fun.
While I understand you were taking someone off their "high horse" in a public forum isn't against any kind of rules or policy. I'm just saying it's not constructive to the site in any way to attack her like you did. Do you really think it's going to change her behavior?
It's just kind of a waste of breath...err... finger energy, to make it an issue.
I'm not saying you didn't have the right too, I'm just saying you should use better judgment when confronting someone. You may have been annoyed by her "shameful flirting", but it takes less energy to ignore her, than it does to attack, defend, and start a thread to open public discussion.
Yeah that's basically what I was saying in the last paragraph of the very post you quoted.
Yet you keep replying...
RobH4413
07-30-2007, 01:14 PM
Speaking of moving on, I think we should all take that advice...
Come on now, it's TRAINING CAMP. If you're not directly involved in this conflict, let's move along...
Good call....
So what do you guys think about the possibility of moving MW to DE, and Phillip Daniels to DT. Would this imply GW has since lost confidence in his miracle picks Golston and Montgomery, or does this say something about his increase of confidence in his linebackers; specifically Rocky.
SmootSmack
07-30-2007, 01:14 PM
I think all that needs to be said has been said here. Any further decisions on this matter will be dealt with privately
Thread locked