Could Thrash Become #2 WR

Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

jsarno
08-10-2007, 03:51 PM
To answer your question, only in theory.

If we allow him to be #2, we are in SERIOUS trouble.

TheMalcolmConnection
08-10-2007, 03:53 PM
On a side note, I'm giving all the receivers a pass from last year. EVERYONE'S production was down. Brunell basically would force the ball to Moss and Cooley and didn't look anywhere else.

Campbell if anything, likes to spread the ball around and I think that if we have all four receivers on the field at once, we can count on any one of those guys.

jsarno
08-10-2007, 03:59 PM
On a side note, I'm giving all the receivers a pass from last year. EVERYONE'S production was down. Brunell basically would force the ball to Moss and Cooley and didn't look anywhere else.

Campbell if anything, likes to spread the ball around and I think that if we have all four receivers on the field at once, we can count on any one of those guys.

I absolutely agree.
Like I've said before, I think we will all be pleasantly surprised with Lloyd's production this year.

GusFrerotte
08-10-2007, 04:34 PM
Have to agree with Matty, he isn' going to move up the depth chart at all, with the exception the other guys get serious injuries. Thrash was was at the top of his game his last year with us the first go around and his first season with the Eagles. IF he hasn't cracked a top 3 spot he never will at this point.

Skinny Tee
08-10-2007, 04:48 PM
He should be used more as our posession reciever. He seems to be able to make some great posession catches. We have a need for that in our offense.

If Corey Bradford makes the team he also might be used as such.

Crazyhorse1
08-10-2007, 05:00 PM
On a side note, I'm giving all the receivers a pass from last year. EVERYONE'S production was down. Brunell basically would force the ball to Moss and Cooley and didn't look anywhere else.

Campbell if anything, likes to spread the ball around and I think that if we have all four receivers on the field at once, we can count on any one of those guys.

I couldn't agree more. I have no idea what Lloyd can do down field because
Brunell couldn't throw there, not even to Moss (last year), and by the time Campbell showed up Lloyd was alread buried on the bench.

chrisl13
08-10-2007, 05:30 PM
im sure he wont be a #2 receiver because i know that the Skins wouldnt pay a 4th stringer[Randle El, Brandon Lloyd] a 30 million dollar contract

dall-assblows
08-10-2007, 05:38 PM
thrash always looks good in the scrimmages. i love thrash but there is no way, baring injury, that trash is #2

Makers3245
08-10-2007, 05:44 PM
Trash is considered a great #3 - #4 WR. Because he is very easy to lose out there on the field, especially when on the same field as Moss and Randle El who have big play potential every time they tie up their cleats. Making him a good WR to look at when you need a Catch to move the chains, even more so because he is not afraid to absorb the big hit over the middle.

But no, no way is he a #2 starting caliber Wide Out.

SmootSmack
08-10-2007, 05:50 PM
On a side note, I'm giving all the receivers a pass from last year. EVERYONE'S production was down. Brunell basically would force the ball to Moss and Cooley and didn't look anywhere else.

Campbell if anything, likes to spread the ball around and I think that if we have all four receivers on the field at once, we can count on any one of those guys.

I really don't want to rehash the name Brunell (I keep vowing not to), but I remember "going all GTripp" last year and reviewing the distribution of receivers thrown to during Brunell's games vs Campbell's. The difference was minimum at best. In fact, I think Brunell had a higher number.

Anyhow, my point is that I think the receivers will do better this year, but I think that's just as much a product of being more accustomed to the system than anything else.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum