|
firstdown 10-22-2007, 03:47 PM how come when the skins sign big free agents, and they suck, its news. but when the eagles do it, not a word? Kearse and Howard have alot of money tied up in the eagles cap, and both suck. but no one says anything? why do their front office get a free pass?
Maybe by looking back over the past 5 years and the difference in the teams winning records.
Smooter 10-22-2007, 06:43 PM My point is why beat them down when we could easily be in their shoes?
Blue Star 10-22-2007, 09:31 PM This has bad Karma written all over... fans of the second-to-last-place team heaping shit on the last place team for no good reason. If we finish last in the NFC east you fuckers are to blame (along w/ Gibbs, Saunders, Moss, and the entire right side of the line - I f'n hate Fabini and Wade, how do we end up with such losers for back-ups?)
Hmm I remember early in the year Jansen went down and I questioned why not pick up more experienced linemen instead of wide receivers. I got chewed out (RobH4413&TheMalcolmConnection)now look at the o-line LOLOLOLOLOL. Then again I don't think the Pats oline would help the skins score points. Christ, Llyod still has more catches than Caldwell which is just one freaking catch. LOL
MTRedskinsFan 10-23-2007, 12:39 AM how come when the skins sign big free agents, and they suck, its news. but when the eagles do it, not a word? Kearse and Howard have alot of money tied up in the eagles cap, and both suck. but no one says anything? why do their front office get a free pass?
Because this is the first year Philly isn't dominating the division in, like, a hundred billion years.
If we could just dominate for 1 or 2 years I'll shut the hell up for at least a decade.
SmootSmack 10-23-2007, 01:28 AM Because this is the first year Philly isn't dominating the division in, like, a hundred billion years.
If we could just dominate for 1 or 2 years I'll shut the hell up for at least a decade.
hundred billion years. two years. same difference
GTripp0012 10-23-2007, 01:48 AM Philly started pretty bad in 2003 also, and then got a few fluke plays and ended up winning a bunch of games.
If Westbrook stays healthy, that team will be around at the end of the year. I doubt they can jump three teams though. They didn't have a whole lot of divisional competition back in 2003.
dgack 10-23-2007, 06:11 AM hundred billion years. two years. same difference
Yeah, give me a break... statistically, Philly's so-called "dominance" was nothing more than a blip on the radar during some dark years for the Cowboys, Giants, and Redskins. IIRC, their lifetime W-L in the division is only slightly better than what the Cards' was when they were in the division.
Philadelphia always returns to a default state of mediocre-bad because it's what the evil, trashy fans there deserve. It's football karma!
chrisl4064 10-23-2007, 07:45 AM Philly started pretty bad in 2003 also, and then got a few fluke plays and ended up winning a bunch of games.
If Westbrook stays healthy, that team will be around at the end of the year. I doubt they can jump three teams though. They didn't have a whole lot of divisional competition back in 2003.
true, and in 2003 they had better recievers, and a healthy capable mcnabb.
i also heard a rumor Dawkins may be out for the season from that hit delivered by Yoder... is there any truth to this?
Smooter 10-23-2007, 08:33 AM Nothing to do with football, but It seems they have the ugliest people too.
The Least Attractive People Are In ... - AOL News (http://news.aol.com/story/_a/the-least-attractive-people-are-in-/20071022194309990001?ncid=NWS00010000000001)
chrisl4064 10-23-2007, 08:56 AM Nothing to do with football, but It seems they have the ugliest people too.
The Least Attractive People Are In ... - AOL News (http://news.aol.com/story/_a/the-least-attractive-people-are-in-/20071022194309990001?ncid=NWS00010000000001)
haha hilarious
|