So, is there freedom of speech here or what?

I guess its politically correct to support Gibbs but thats a damn tall order as of late.

You are really pissing everyone off, maybe that's why? This whole fucking "Kool Aid Drinkers" stereotype for anyone who thinks we have a GOOD football team is absolutely ridiculous. You act like you're the SAVIOR of all Redskins fans, the only one with the right answers, trying to open our eyes to the truth that Gibbs sucks.

Your thread was shut down because it's plain stupid. If Jason Campbell throws a touchdown pass instead of an interception everything changes. ONE PLAY changes the entire game and you don't have a leg to stand on.

Why do you insist on ATTACKING other fans?? "Allowing" them to "seek" amnesty? Who the fuck are you? WE ARE STILL A GOOD FOOTBALL TEAM. YOU might not think so, that's YOUR opinion and you are entitled to it on this web site. STOP thinking that you're better than everyone else and that you are being repressed for trying to spread the truth.


First off, I love JC and he was one of the few good pickups of this regime. He is a legit bad ass in this league. Next, why am I "stupid" because I think this team is headed to hell in a handbasket? If Campbell makes the TD throw then what? We barely beat a team with their backup QB and no running game, gimme a break lady. WE ARE NOT A GOOD FOOTBALL TEAM. And I think Im being repressed because my threads are mysterioulsy snubbed.

You are really pissing everyone off, maybe that's why? This whole fucking "Kool Aid Drinkers" stereotype for anyone who thinks we have a GOOD football team is absolutely ridiculous. You act like you're the SAVIOR of all Redskins fans, the only one with the right answers, trying to open our eyes to the truth that Gibbs sucks.

Your thread was shut down because it's plain stupid. If Jason Campbell throws a touchdown pass instead of an interception everything changes. ONE PLAY changes the entire game and you don't have a leg to stand on.

Why do you insist on ATTACKING other fans?? "Allowing" them to "seek" amnesty? Who the fuck are you? WE ARE STILL A GOOD FOOTBALL TEAM. YOU might not think so, that's YOUR opinion and you are entitled to it on this web site. STOP thinking that you're better than everyone else and that you are being repressed for trying to spread the truth.


I love this part:

Your thread was shut down because it's plain stupid. If Jason Campbell throws a touchdown pass instead of an interception everything changes. ONE PLAY changes the entire game and you don't have a leg to stand on.

If ifs and buts were candy and nuts........

Whatever, the game is what it is, and the head coach takes responsibility. This team is done, and Joe Gibbs is the problem. Give me a new head coach and a GM and I'll then drink the kool aid for 3 years, Gibbs 3 years are done.

C'mon PSF you're just trying to instigate. There are better ways to go about having this discussion.

If there was no freedom of speech here you certainly wouldn't be around, and you wouldn't be sporting annoying signatures all the time.

First off, I love JC and he was one of the few good pickups of this regime.

Personally, I find the following were also good acquisitions ( in no particular order):

1. Chris Cooley
2. London Fletcher
3. Laron Landry.
4. Shaun Suisham
5. Sean Taylor
6. James Thrash, and I'll even throw in
7. Stephon Heyer ( a diamond in the rough).



I think the Redskins have been snake-bit this year by injuries. Some years that happens.

IMHO.

J-Dawg

Personally, I find the following were also good acquisitions ( in no particular order):

1. Chris Cooley
2. London Fletcher
3. Laron Landry.
4. Shaun Suisham
5. Sean Taylor
6. James Thrash, and I'll even throw in
7. Stephon Heyer ( a diamond in the rough).



I think the Redskins have been snake-bit this year by injuries. Some years that happens.

IMHO.

J-Dawg

Other factors as well but injuries are a major one.

Other factors as well but injuries are a major one.


I remember YEARS ago listening to Ken Beatriz ("You're next, on Sports talk!") and someone asked him why the skins were so good that year and he said something to the effect that one of the biggest determinants is which team had the fewest injuries at critical positions.

We were not that fortunate this year. A new QB with a (albeit decent) patchwork O-line, Rogers an Taylor both going out at the same time, Moss playing hurt ('every step is excruciating').

I think ole Kenny had it right.

Not the only reason, but a big one.

J-Dawg.

The injury excuse gets old to me. You will always have injuries in football, it's part of the game. Yes, we've lost some critical players, but there are plenty of teams that are winning that have also lost some of the most crucial players on their team.

The injury excuse gets old to me. You will always have injuries in football, it's part of the game. Yes, we've lost some critical players, but there are plenty of teams that are winning that have also lost some of the most crucial players on their team.

Name a few.

Whoa! (as I gentle dip my big toe into the ever warming skins hot tub)

When I heard that Gibbs would be coaching the Skins again, my heart jumped with excitation. When I woke up the next day, I remember how different the game is today, from when he left. Is he still smart - Yes, but the game is different. His better years were with Bobby Bethard. His better years were with Plan B Free Agency. He won with less than average skilled guys like Schroeder, Rypien, Ruppert and Tony Robinson (his strike year was his greatest coaching year), because he was the BEST motivator in the game, and he made the BEST adjustments at the half. Most people would not place someone in charge of their operations, that has been out of the game for 14 years. I mentioned before that it looks like Jesse James came back from the dead, and gathered is crew and is riding to the nearest Suntrust trying to "hold up" the back. I don't think that the gang from the 80's can pull off the job in 2007. (see the list of coaches from redskins.com)

With that being said, many teams cannot function will without personnel consistance. We have not had that. Most successful Redskins teams were anchored by DYNAMIC OL play. To a man. This replacement line is bad. Samuals (who is fading), Thomas, Jensen and Rabach are good. Heyer and Kendall are getting better, Wade sucks. We have no depth there, and you won't find many disgruntal OL picks or bottom feed the waiver wire for viable OL candidates. I think Management sees that, and there will be a change. Our play calling has been hindered by the Lines inability to perform.

Win or lose I have seen improvements in Jason's game. I think he will be better. He does not appear to be the vocal. He may be Sally Hemmings to Gibbs' Thomas Jefferson - but that is cool. I would like to know why it appear that he does not have all wristband set up that all other QBs use. Unless I am wrong, it makes me think that he does not have all formations and call at his disposal. I understood that last year, but not now. His no huddle looks great against teams that sub out situational players (see the Philly Game), but if he does not have more plays he is truly limited. He is better than last season, and will be better next year.

Defensively we run the cover 2 alot. It would work soo much better if we had a DLine that does not give a QB 7 secs to throw. Our talent evaluators will have to see this. We have a running list of people we over paid for. Deion, Archueletta and Lloyd are enough to acknowledge that we are not spending wisely.

These problems would still exist if we score on the final play of 4 game ( but there are three game we should have won by more than three). A win is a win, a Loss is a Loss. I n either situation, I must be honest in my evaluation of what needs to happen to for this team - My Team, to excel.

I am Rhaamses, and I approve this post