ESPN Ranks the Top 64 QB's [Archive] - Page 4 - Commanders Post at The Warpath

BringBackJoeT

12-15-2007, 01:12 PM

I really wish you hadn't posted that; it's depressing on far too many levels.

Yeah. Add it to the fact that Norv Turner is the head coach of a playoff bound team, and it's enough to make you cry.

jsarno

12-16-2007, 07:14 PM

Plus he is more accurate, with a quicker release, a stronger arm, and no running game

I assume you are saying Peyton is the better one, but just in case you weren't, and you are saying Brady was better...

Accuaracy:
Manning 64.0% comp.
Brady 63.0% comp.
Advantage - Manning.

Manning has a stronger arm by far, and that is common knowledge.

About the running game...they are actually very similar over the last 4 years:
(pats 1st, colts 2nd)
2007, 14th - 12th (colts by only 2)
2006, 12th - 18th (pats by 4)
2005, 24th - 16th (colts by 8)
2004, 7th - 15th (pats by 8)
Advantage, Patriots (barely).

So the colts have a better running game this year by only 2 teams. Pretty damn close though. Overall, the last 4 years (including this year), the Pats have actually had a slightly better running game. But not by much. So the no running game comment doesn't really work for either team. It's too close to call.


	Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum > ESPN Ranks the Top 64 QB's PDA ESPN Ranks the Top 64 QB's Pages : 1 2 3 [4] BringBackJoeT 12-15-2007, 01:12 PM I really wish you hadn't posted that; it's depressing on far too many levels. Yeah. Add it to the fact that Norv Turner is the head coach of a playoff bound team, and it's enough to make you cry. jsarno 12-16-2007, 07:14 PM Plus he is more accurate, with a quicker release, a stronger arm, and no running game I assume you are saying Peyton is the better one, but just in case you weren't, and you are saying Brady was better... Accuaracy: Manning 64.0% comp. Brady 63.0% comp. Advantage - Manning. Manning has a stronger arm by far, and that is common knowledge. About the running game...they are actually very similar over the last 4 years: (pats 1st, colts 2nd) 2007, 14th - 12th (colts by only 2) 2006, 12th - 18th (pats by 4) 2005, 24th - 16th (colts by 8) 2004, 7th - 15th (pats by 8) Advantage, Patriots (barely). So the colts have a better running game this year by only 2 teams. Pretty damn close though. Overall, the last 4 years (including this year), the Pats have actually had a slightly better running game. But not by much. So the no running game comment doesn't really work for either team. It's too close to call.