F...Jim Cramer

gUkbdjetlY8
rOVXh4xM-Ww

Yea I agree. Also why is this in the locker room?

Oh jeez, should be in the parking lot. It's late at night, I'm tired as hell and I lack concentration. Fear not though, SmootSmack will come to the rescue!

I see you got so used to posting in the parking lot that you assumed the locker room was now...the parking garage? :)

But the question wasn't about Bear Stearns stock, unless I heard it wrong. It was about Bear Stearns in terms of liquidity. And he added that Bear Stearns was likely to be taken over (presumably by someone with deeper pockets and hence some guarantee on the investments).

Oh jeez, should be in the parking lot. It's late at night, I'm tired as hell and I lack concentration. Fear not though, SmootSmack will come to the rescue!

I guess I'll have to do. ;)

I'm tired of all of these media figures who yell and go over the top to get attention. Cramer, Dobbs and the rest of them should be sent into exile.

I'm tired of all of these media figures who yell and go over the top to get attention. Cramer, Dobbs and the rest of them should be sent into exile.

WHAT DO YOU KNOW??? CRAMER IS AWESOME!!!!! :)

I see you got so used to posting in the parking lot that you assumed the locker room was now...the parking garage? :)

But the question wasn't about Bear Stearns stock, unless I heard it wrong. It was about Bear Stearns in terms of liquidity. And he added that Bear Stearns was likely to be taken over (presumably by someone with deeper pockets and hence some guarantee on the investments).

No, no, no...I know what you're talking about, you're talking about his interview where he tried to cover his ass big time after the brutal day Bear Stearns had on Monday.

Read the question and see if it relates to "withdrawal of deposits" or "liquidation of shares." Investing 101 tells you cash doesn't need to be liquidated because it's already liquid!!! He either didn't understand the question, highly unlikely, or he is blatantly lying to cover his ass.

Cramer and CNBC need to be sued into oblivion.

Wait a minute. So the question on the show is "Should I be worried about Bear Stearns in terms of liquidity and get my money out of there?"

To which Cramer says no and BSC will probably be taken over.

So maybe I don't understand the question.

Besides, why should CNBC and Cramer be sued anyway? Do you sue your weatherman when he says sunny skies and you walk out in the rain without an umbrella? This is essentially free advice that is being given out on a tv show. I don't know that you can legitimately make a case to sue for that.

saden, im with smooty on this. just because Cramer yells the loudest, doesn't mean he has the most insight. would you listen to Rush? i really cant even stand watching those guys. let alone taking their advice