Taking WR Early is a Gamble

Pages : 1 [2]

SmootSmack
04-14-2008, 12:27 AM
Redskins- packers game is on NFL Network right now. Moss sure stinked it up that game. It sure is sad to watch Sean Taylor running around on the field.

Thanks for the heads up. Damn, this is still really difficult to watch (not the game, but ST)

freddyg12
04-14-2008, 09:36 PM
Riggo on the nfl network mock draft sees wr as a possibility:

NFL Video Galleries (http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d807b54b5)

goodolddb
04-15-2008, 11:13 AM
Skins should not address a WR in the first round. The talent is not there this year and drafting a WR in the 1st is always hard. We wait untill round 2-3 and draft a good route runner with size and smarts. My choice would be Jordy Nelson, this kid can play! Check out some jordy nelson clips on you tube

BenBoomZ
04-15-2008, 06:25 PM
you're right, we shouldn't take a chance on Early Doucet! We should take Limas Sweed because John Riggins said so!

prinzeofmoval
04-15-2008, 07:52 PM
Taking a reciever isn't a gamble..You show me where a reciever was a bust and i show you a horrible offensive line or crappy qb. Barring a injury a good reciever is a good reciever.

SmootSmack
04-15-2008, 08:26 PM
Taking a reciever isn't a gamble..You show me where a reciever was a bust and i show you a horrible offensive line or crappy qb. Barring a injury a good reciever is a good reciever.

It's not as simple as "a good receiver is a good receiver"

Besides, it's not as much about is the receiver good it's more about will he make the team better (more so than another position drafted in that slot)

KLHJ2
04-15-2008, 09:12 PM
Taking a reciever isn't a gamble..You show me where a reciever was a bust and i show you a horrible offensive line or crappy qb. Barring a injury a good reciever is a good reciever.

Desmond Howard had Brunell and Favre. Both teams had solid O lines and made the playoffs. Howard still flopped outside of the passing game.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum