Sheriff gonna getcha, decleating Kiwanuka

Pages : 1 2 [3] 4 5

onlydarksets
09-06-2008, 09:15 PM
Kiwanuka is a pussy and Pierce is a punk. I agree completely with Tuck. Samuels wasn't trying to be a dirty player but there is no way he'd let Kiwanuka put his QB out for the season.
Giants DE Kiwanuka accuses Redskins DE Samuels of 'dirty' play (http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d80a8ced5&template=with-video&confirm=true)
I really don't think anyone on the Giants, especially Pierce, are in a position to comment on "cheap shots".

sportscurmudgeon
09-06-2008, 09:27 PM
Anyone who does not think that was a cheap shot by Samuels on the last play of the game forfeits their right to screech when the Giants take a cheap shot on Samuels in the rematch. I fully expect at least one shot to Samuels lower legs in the second game. It will cost the Giants 15 yards, but I expect it will happen.

onlydarksets
09-06-2008, 09:33 PM
People don't seem to understand the difference between an illegal play and a cheap shot. Samuel's tackling of Kiwanuka was clearly against the rules (i.e., illegal). However, there is nothing that suggests it was an attempt to hurt Kiwanuka (i.e., a cheap shot).

MTK
09-07-2008, 01:58 AM
People don't seem to understand the difference between an illegal play and a cheap shot. Samuel's tackling of Kiwanuka was clearly against the rules (i.e., illegal). However, there is nothing that suggests it was an attempt to hurt Kiwanuka (i.e., a cheap shot).

Agreed.

Ruhskins
09-07-2008, 03:16 AM
Yup ,a cheap shot .Ok you'er beat, grab some jersey don't dive at his legs or ankels.Just remember as I said the chip block was perfect,texbook...but it took two players.Jacobs did it by himself.

You're making no sense. Please write a more coherent sentence.

Giantone
09-07-2008, 04:40 PM
He didn't dive at his ankles he grabbed his waist and tackled him. Landing on the back of his legs wasn't intentional.


Yes it was anyone who has ever played football knows when you do what he did there is only one way to land!Why not just hold him???

Giantone
09-07-2008, 04:42 PM
You're making no sense. Please write a more coherent sentence.


Start at the begining and maybe you could comprehend things a little better.

Giantone
09-07-2008, 04:45 PM
People don't seem to understand the difference between an illegal play and a cheap shot. Samuel's tackling of Kiwanuka was clearly against the rules (i.e., illegal). However, there is nothing that suggests it was an attempt to hurt Kiwanuka (i.e., a cheap shot).

Holding,grabing some Jersey ...yup illegal but not cheap I agree,diving on the mans legs from behind..............dirty.I can defend myself when I see a player coming at me but when they come from behind there is nothing a man can do.What people seem to forget also is he just sat out most of last year with a broken leg ...the same leg.Why do you think a clip is illegal or no blocking in the back,or even the horse coller rule?

MTK
09-07-2008, 04:46 PM
Ugh let it go. There was no diving on his legs he simply held him and brought him down.

If it was dirty the league will fine Samuels.

Giantone
09-07-2008, 04:50 PM
Ugh let it go. There was no diving on his legs he simply held him and brought him down.

If it was dirty the league will fine Samuels.



I'll say 10 grand

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum