Darrell_Green_28
12-03-2008, 09:19 AM
Heck if we dont count the plays the giants scored on, we would have won the game..
I know something you don't know: Redskins-Giants first half quick hitsDarrell_Green_28 12-03-2008, 09:19 AM Heck if we dont count the plays the giants scored on, we would have won the game.. GTripp0012 12-03-2008, 09:50 AM I have a hard time blaming our CB's for anything as the D line is giving them no help and QB's have all day to throw. You take any team with a good QB and good Wr's and they are going to beat you when giving all day to throw the ball. In our win's this year we have been lucky that either the teams with good WR's and QB's had an off game or we were playing teams withe poor QB's and WR's.See #4 under players having a good game. GTripp0012 12-03-2008, 09:51 AM Nice stuff G! Thankyou I imagine it took some time to put all this stuff together. Apologies for the following. Do you have this stuff in summary form somewhere?No, this is a warpath exclusive. Unless you're talking about my game notes spreadsheet, in which case, yes I do, but it will be way more cool when I have the game finished. GTripp0012 12-03-2008, 09:54 AM Good analysis GTripp, you obviously did your homework. I'm a little more hesitant to fault the defensive play or the play calling though. Remember, this is the highest scoring offense in the league and Manning was on fire in the first half; he converted numerous third and longs by perfectly placing balls that otherwise would have been incomplete; the coverage was that tight. As much as it pains me to admit it, I'm beginning to believe that when Manning is at his best, he's as good as anyone (especially with the deep ball) and he was at his best in the first half of the game. Skins gambled and they played the price. The fact is, the Giants are a superior team, and you won't beat a superior team without throwing the dice.Eli definately beat us in the first half, but I think every QB in the league is capable of beating us in the same way if we use the same gameplan in the same conditions. We were severely handicapped in this game by our defensive coaching, and it really speaks to the aggressiveness that the DL and tacklers played with that we were in this game at half. Dblock804 12-03-2008, 09:57 AM Eli still looks he would hold one. And Giants fans love it. Who would ever respect any player that refused to go to the team that drafted him. He's a baby. Hog1 12-03-2008, 10:43 AM No, this is a warpath exclusive. Unless you're talking about my game notes spreadsheet, in which case, yes I do, but it will be way more cool when I have the game finished. What made me think about it is the..........cry for qb change on the Skins. One station was running some stats that say: On teams that have suspect O-lines, and "high" rate of sacks and hurries, that qb rating average of 78% Teams with strong O lines and low sacks and hurries, that qb rating is average 88%. For the purpose of their study, they had JC at 88%.......and naturally performing above average....considering. Your analysis brings to light some interesting things! hooskins 12-03-2008, 12:55 PM haha I love how haters still refuse to look at the analysis in their bashing. It's great. how about you spend time looking at each play and each player and then come back with the same complaints. SBXVII 12-03-2008, 03:11 PM I don't care how you spin it. 6 yrds per carry or 50 pass in a WR direction we sucked. We could not move the ball, could not score points, and kept dropping balls. Our run offense went no where. SBXVII 12-03-2008, 03:13 PM Lets look at another stat. How many drives stalled prior to the 50 yrd line. How many ended in punts? Giantone 12-03-2008, 03:52 PM Heck if we dont count the plays the giants scored on, we would have won the game.. LOL,there ya go ,we have a winner.No you guys miss my point to see the true production ya remove the best and the worst play and then you get the real average.(not whining,really) |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum