Skins4L
01-11-2009, 07:34 PM
Why turn the fact that we SWEPT PHILLY and BEAT ARIZONA a negative?
Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?Skins4L 01-11-2009, 07:34 PM Why turn the fact that we SWEPT PHILLY and BEAT ARIZONA a negative? SmootSmack 01-11-2009, 07:36 PM Why turn the fact that we SWEPT PHILLY and BEAT ARIZONA a negative? It's what we do best EARTHQUAKE2689 01-11-2009, 07:43 PM It's what we do best that and complaining we can do that with the best of them Hog1 01-11-2009, 07:43 PM It's what we do best sad..........but true............a long off-season........... 44ever 01-11-2009, 07:57 PM Redskins vs Bengals or Rams Good sign. Bad sign or sign of danger Sorry Pain I couldn't resist :) Scott 01-11-2009, 08:03 PM 3-2 against the remaining teams in contention...I think it just shows that we can play with the best of them, but not consistently... The Goat 01-11-2009, 08:06 PM All it means is that the Steelers are likely to win another SB and we all get hear Steelers fans louder than ever. F*ck. saden1 01-11-2009, 08:14 PM Means nothing beyond the fact that the unexpected can happen. My money is on the Ravens to win it all (Big Ben + Ed Reed = INT) but then again I remember what happened last year. SFREDSKIN 01-11-2009, 08:15 PM All it means is that the Steelers are likely to win another SB and we all get hear Steelers fans louder than ever. F*ck. Wrong. I think Baltimore pulls the upset. Trample the Elderly 01-11-2009, 08:23 PM I don't think it means anything. Now let's go Arizona. Go out and beat the brakes of the Filth-a-delphia Yardbirds. Better yet win the Superbowl. He he he. Yeah Right! |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum