Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?

Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8

Skins4L
01-11-2009, 07:34 PM
Why turn the fact that we SWEPT PHILLY and BEAT ARIZONA a negative?

SmootSmack
01-11-2009, 07:36 PM
Why turn the fact that we SWEPT PHILLY and BEAT ARIZONA a negative?

It's what we do best

EARTHQUAKE2689
01-11-2009, 07:43 PM
It's what we do best


that and complaining we can do that with the best of them

Hog1
01-11-2009, 07:43 PM
It's what we do best
sad..........but true............a long off-season...........

44ever
01-11-2009, 07:57 PM
Redskins vs Bengals or Rams Good sign. Bad sign or sign of danger

Sorry Pain I couldn't resist :)

Scott
01-11-2009, 08:03 PM
3-2 against the remaining teams in contention...I think it just shows that we can play with the best of them, but not consistently...

The Goat
01-11-2009, 08:06 PM
All it means is that the Steelers are likely to win another SB and we all get hear Steelers fans louder than ever. F*ck.

saden1
01-11-2009, 08:14 PM
Means nothing beyond the fact that the unexpected can happen. My money is on the Ravens to win it all (Big Ben + Ed Reed = INT) but then again I remember what happened last year.

SFREDSKIN
01-11-2009, 08:15 PM
All it means is that the Steelers are likely to win another SB and we all get hear Steelers fans louder than ever. F*ck.

Wrong. I think Baltimore pulls the upset.

Trample the Elderly
01-11-2009, 08:23 PM
I don't think it means anything.

Now let's go Arizona. Go out and beat the brakes of the Filth-a-delphia Yardbirds. Better yet win the Superbowl. He he he. Yeah Right!

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum