OM FIELD: Redskins OL - Tale of the Tape

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 [6]

53Fan
04-09-2009, 05:38 PM
The point is - bigger is not always better.

Never said it was.

warriorzpath
04-09-2009, 05:46 PM
It's not JUST about whether bigger is better. You don't draft a guy JUST because of size. But if you can get the same skill set, footwork, longarms, quickness, etc. AND the guy is 315 over the guy you have at 288, then yes, I think it's an upgrade.

And that's what I've been arguing all along. You have a list of things that determine what makes a lineman play well. Number one priority on that list is not weight unless having more weight is the reason why he plays so well (or conversely, he plays poorly).

My point is that being bigger is not necessarily better. I'm sorry to be so argumentative about stuff like this, but any kind of hype really bothers me.

I just hate all the hype that people pay attention to and neglect all of the other more important things.

53Fan
04-09-2009, 05:56 PM
I'm not trying to overlook anything. If a player isn't very good and doesn't possess the proper skills for the position, you don't take him no matter what size he is. But there are some very good players who are bigger than what we've been using, the size of these guys are getting bigger all the time. At all positions. It's becoming increasingly harder to handle the nose tackles in this league. If you can increase the size of your o-line without sacrificing talent, I'm all for it.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum