JLC: Orakpo, Sanchez Scenarios, Updates

Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 5

GMScud
04-16-2009, 06:15 PM
"I continue to hear the Redskins primary focus is to move up and draft Mark Sanchez."

Why do we insist on being retarded year after year?

53Fan
04-16-2009, 06:43 PM
"I continue to hear the Redskins primary focus is to move up and draft Mark Sanchez."

Why do we insist on being retarded year after year?

Good question. I wish I knew the answer.

Redskin Warrior
04-16-2009, 06:49 PM
Think the Skins F.O. want me to get a new team to root for or they are putting up a real good smokescreen.

johno
04-16-2009, 07:20 PM
why cant the FO keep their head on straight, draft someone to keep campbell off his ass, and give this offense a chance? its beyond frustrating.

SFREDSKIN
04-16-2009, 07:26 PM
why cant the FO keep their head on straight, draft someone to keep campbell off his ass, and give this offense a chance? its beyond frustrating.

Someone, say like Alex Mack? I would trade down, pick Mack, get and additional draft pick and go for a LB with the second pick, then a DE. We'll see what the FO will do.

53Fan
04-16-2009, 07:31 PM
Someone, say like Alex Mack? I would trade down, pick Mack, get and additional draft pick and go for a LB with the second pick, then a DE. We'll see what the FO will do.

That makes waaaaaaay too much sense SFREDSKIN. Next thing you know we'd be winning championships. Get real dude. :)

rbanerjee23
04-16-2009, 07:31 PM
why cant the FO keep their head on straight, draft someone to keep campbell off his ass, and give this offense a chance? its beyond frustrating.
amen brother

GTripp0012
04-16-2009, 07:42 PM
That makes waaaaaaay too much sense SFREDSKIN. Next thing you know we'd be winning championships. Get real dude. :)I think we've got the wrong idea. Let's not worry about trading down for Mack, I think we should be trying to posture to move up from the third round and get him somewhere between 31-37 (if he's there).

johno
04-16-2009, 07:58 PM
SFREDSKIN -- I am with you on that, lets take Mack and a 2nd rounder. This is officially the best case scenario in my eyes, after one of the "big 4" OTs falling to us.

53Fan
04-16-2009, 08:03 PM
I think we've got the wrong idea. Let's not worry about trading down for Mack, I think we should be trying to posture to move up from the third round and get him somewhere between 31-37 (if he's there).

I had'nt really thought of it that way Tripp but it works for me. I just want him on OUR line.......for many, many years. Up or down, let's get him.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum