GMScud
04-16-2009, 06:15 PM
"I continue to hear the Redskins primary focus is to move up and draft Mark Sanchez."
Why do we insist on being retarded year after year?
Why do we insist on being retarded year after year?
JLC: Orakpo, Sanchez Scenarios, UpdatesGMScud 04-16-2009, 06:15 PM "I continue to hear the Redskins primary focus is to move up and draft Mark Sanchez." Why do we insist on being retarded year after year? 53Fan 04-16-2009, 06:43 PM "I continue to hear the Redskins primary focus is to move up and draft Mark Sanchez." Why do we insist on being retarded year after year? Good question. I wish I knew the answer. Redskin Warrior 04-16-2009, 06:49 PM Think the Skins F.O. want me to get a new team to root for or they are putting up a real good smokescreen. johno 04-16-2009, 07:20 PM why cant the FO keep their head on straight, draft someone to keep campbell off his ass, and give this offense a chance? its beyond frustrating. SFREDSKIN 04-16-2009, 07:26 PM why cant the FO keep their head on straight, draft someone to keep campbell off his ass, and give this offense a chance? its beyond frustrating. Someone, say like Alex Mack? I would trade down, pick Mack, get and additional draft pick and go for a LB with the second pick, then a DE. We'll see what the FO will do. 53Fan 04-16-2009, 07:31 PM Someone, say like Alex Mack? I would trade down, pick Mack, get and additional draft pick and go for a LB with the second pick, then a DE. We'll see what the FO will do. That makes waaaaaaay too much sense SFREDSKIN. Next thing you know we'd be winning championships. Get real dude. :) rbanerjee23 04-16-2009, 07:31 PM why cant the FO keep their head on straight, draft someone to keep campbell off his ass, and give this offense a chance? its beyond frustrating. amen brother GTripp0012 04-16-2009, 07:42 PM That makes waaaaaaay too much sense SFREDSKIN. Next thing you know we'd be winning championships. Get real dude. :)I think we've got the wrong idea. Let's not worry about trading down for Mack, I think we should be trying to posture to move up from the third round and get him somewhere between 31-37 (if he's there). johno 04-16-2009, 07:58 PM SFREDSKIN -- I am with you on that, lets take Mack and a 2nd rounder. This is officially the best case scenario in my eyes, after one of the "big 4" OTs falling to us. 53Fan 04-16-2009, 08:03 PM I think we've got the wrong idea. Let's not worry about trading down for Mack, I think we should be trying to posture to move up from the third round and get him somewhere between 31-37 (if he's there). I had'nt really thought of it that way Tripp but it works for me. I just want him on OUR line.......for many, many years. Up or down, let's get him. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum