SI Ranks Offensive Backfields

...........no,he's the owner.:food-smil

:laughing- The more plastic surgery he gets, the more he looks like him.

but there is no way in hell our backfield is 26th in the NFL. Portis alone should place it in the top 20... even if Pee Wee Herman was his QB.

...maybe thats the case but with Campbell/Portis in the 2nd half of 2008 we averaged 12.5 ppg. Id go out on a limb and say Pee Wee Herman would of gotten us at least 14. :laughing2

yeah but was that totally Portis and Campbell's fault? The whole team was worse in the second half. The O-line was banged up and suffered, the receivers dropped balls and the rookies were injured, even Sellers regressed. Not to mention, the defense couldnt stop anyone when needed. If we are strictly talking about the RB and QB, the skins combo is about middle of the road IMO. Portis is a top 10 RB and JC maybe a bottom 10 QB, but not the worst.

yeah but was that totally Portis and Campbell's fault? The whole team was worse in the second half. The O-line was banged up and suffered, the receivers dropped balls and the rookies were injured, even Sellers regressed. Not to mention, the defense couldnt stop anyone when needed. If we are strictly talking about the RB and QB, the skins combo is about middle of the road IMO. Portis is a top 10 RB and JC maybe a bottom 10 QB, but not the worst.

Portis is a top 5 back maybe even top 3. Campbell is no worse then a middle of the pack QB(Somewhere between 15-20).

yeah but was that totally Portis and Campbell's fault? The whole team was worse in the second half. The O-line was banged up and suffered, the receivers dropped balls and the rookies were injured, even Sellers regressed. Not to mention, the defense couldnt stop anyone when needed. If we are strictly talking about the RB and QB, the skins combo is about middle of the road IMO. Portis is a top 10 RB and JC maybe a bottom 10 QB, but not the worst.

When you score 12.5 ppg over a 8 game span id say its the whole offenses fault. Going off the last 8 games by the Redskins I can understand why we have been ranked so low in alot of different articles. Hopefully the Skins can step up their game so we dont have to go through these articles next May and debate if the Skins backfield should be ranked 26th or are they closer to 20th. :laughing-