All NOT in favor of Portis deal!

Something people are forgetting is that Champ's value has been somewhat degraded not only because people know we can't afford to keep him and he wants out of D.C., but also because the CB Free Agent market is flooded. I'm sure people could get Charles Woodson or Chris McCalister for one high #1 pick (unlike Bailey who the Redskins want more for). The RB Free Agent Market however is pathetic (Duce Staley, a 30 year old slightly-above-average back is the best one out there?) and the draft has only two SERIOUS backs who should go in the first round and be decent starters.

If we do get Portis, there is no doubt we will be a deadly offensive team. Coles, Gardner, OL, Portis, Ramsey or Brunell. It will be almost unstoppable offense. On D we will be crushed by ur div opponents in the passing game. Rumor around the league of Keshawn going to Dallas and TO going to Philly will hurt us a lot. Who will cover these guyz? I think we need champ for that reason, but I also understand that it is impossible to meet champ demands considering other wholes we have. I would say we should deal with Detroit instead of Denver and built ur team with the picks acquired from them.

:doh: hahahahaha its great to look back at some of the things that were said back in the day. I know, I know, hindsight is 20/20, but its still hilarious

Wow... I can't wait to go back next year after we win the Super Bowl and laugh and laugh... ALL THE WAY TO THE BANK.

dude i was moving the other day and popped in a tape that i found and it was some nfl reporter show and it was before last season and it was talking about how amazing our offense was and how if only we had a defense we would be unstoppable. It was funny to look back, they were talking about how our defense was below average and the only good player was arrington.

I agree with httr, I am also afraid SS's shadow is still empailing our team, he made player's look so useless that nobody believes any of these guy's are capable of finding the field, let alone play. to bad we will lose champ for a back we don't need, and have holes in area's that we do need, I guess we just send the rest of our back's packing at this point, if we go this route bett's was another obvious waste of a pick for us, but not for the team that will give him a chance.


OK who's posting with my name?

Matty we have an investigation on our hands, I didn't write that.


But I do agree with it.

I would say skincane accidently got on my comp. for that post, but that post is to intelligent for him, so I will investigate else where.


Wo to you who post's in offiss's name and offiss thus has not said it, your punishment shall be swift and strong!

OK maybe I did, A YEAR AND A HALF AGO!

Tuna are you digging up threads from a year and half ago? You got me! :laughing-

this arguement is a year late ;)
champ wasn't that good and he wanted too much money, he was gone either way... did you see him in the national games lat year? he kept falling down and getting burned deep, over and over again. Sure he has a lot of tackles, but thats because people are catching the balls in front of him. Denver also decided to pick up THREE more CBs in the draft this year for whatever reason...

i remember everyone in the media saying smoot couldn't live up and springs wouldn't be nearly as good... but springs had a pro-bowl season (whether he officially won the title or not) and he cost less than HALF of what champ was going for.

if we didn't get portis we would have gone for dillon and not a rookie anyways... and dillon has always been a solid RB.

LOL I was like damn where did this thread come from!

Funny to read these old things

If you wanna see some really funny threads, pull up some of the old game threads. Those are halarious!