What position would you "stack" this year?

This kind of goes along with the Predict the Redskins 2009 Opening Day Roster (http://www.thewarpath.net/redskins-locker-room/29581-predict-the-2009-opening-day-roster.html) thread, but breaks down what a lot of people did into something easier to see.

Last year (by my count, feel free to correct me) carried:

Offense:

3 QB's -- I think that we're fine sticking with 3
4 RB's -- again, not likely to change
5 WR's -- a possibility to carry 6 here
3 TE's -- will likely stick, though not sure who the 3rd will be
9 OL's -- 4 G's 4 T's 1 C

Defense:

6 LB -- will likely stay, but there are probably 3 spots in contention here
5 CB -- I see this staying, with Tryon sticking and Barnes coming in, don't think that you need to build on that too much
5 S -- I think that we only have 6 on the roster right now, so no
4 DTs -- they're all back, plus Haynesworth, Alexander in a hybrid role
6 DE's -- hard to say with the hybrid roles

Specialty:
1 K -- stays
1 P -- stays
1 LS -- stays


Without knowing much of what we have outside of Moss and Randle El -- you have potential in Thomas, questionable potential in Kelly, a possibility that Jaison Williams could bring back solid production, or some late and/or undrafted rookies looking to fill number 5; there is a possibility that we go with 6 receivers, though I'd be more inclined to believe that we just stack the practice squad.


IF we change the numbers, I could see us going with the extra lineman. We haven't signed Kendall and we really don't really have guarantees at backup spots at G or T (and then the whole question about RT as it is). We do have some guys who might be able to contribute though in Mike Williams, Jeremy Bridges, and possibly D'angelo Batiste and Devin Clark. I suppose that training camp will help weed this down, but some of these guys who might not cut it at tackle might be good backups at guard as well, so I could see us keeping an extra there.

As far as the position that loses a guy, maybe DE since we're doing the whole hybrid thing and have 3 players that we want to move around to diff spots (Orakpo, Wilson, Alexander).

I know that some of you guys study this stuff a lot more than me, so you'll probably see flaws in my logic, so it's more about what you think than how right or wrong I am, but feel free to point out what you think of mine.

Washington Redskins Current 2009 Roster (http://www.redskins.com/team/index.jsp?d-49681-o=2&d-49681-p=1&d-49681-s=2)

Washington Redskins 2008 Roster (http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/wire?section=nfl&id=3572043)

I think we can reduce the number of DL by 2, specifically at DE. We can go into the season with Orapko, Daniels, Carter and Jackson (assuming Wilson is a LB) and be fine. We have enough players on the DL that can play multiple positions (Alexander, Daniels, Haynesworth) that we don't have to overload that position with bodies.

It's going to be really interesting what happens at the #3 RB position. I can see Aldridge or Dorsey making the team over Rock if one of them has an outstanding preseason on special teams. Our 3rd RB won't get more than 15 carries all season so he's got to make his money on teams. We've severely lacked explosiveness on teams for years now and that's the one thing both of them bring.

You also have 5 safeties, I doubt we go past 4.

I would stck a new team owner, Jack Kent Cooke was the best thing the Redskins ever had. Synder is your down fall . That's why u havent won a Super Bowl since 1992. Get rid of Synder!!!!

I would say OL, DL and WR that's were we need the most help.

I would stck a new team owner, Jack Kent Cooke was the best thing the Redskins ever had. Synder is your down fall . That's why u havent won a Super Bowl since 1992. Get rid of Synder!!!!

So we should add another owner? Try reading.

I think we can reduce the number of DL by 2, specifically at DE. We can go into the season with Orapko, Daniels, Carter and Jackson (assuming Wilson is a LB) and be fine. We have enough players on the DL that can play multiple positions (Alexander, Daniels, Haynesworth) that we don't have to overload that position with bodies.

It's going to be really interesting what happens at the #3 RB position. I can see Aldridge or Dorsey making the team over Rock if one of them has an outstanding preseason on special teams. Our 3rd RB won't get more than 15 carries all season so he's got to make his money on teams. We've severely lacked explosiveness on teams for years now and that's the one thing both of them bring.

You also have 5 safeties, I doubt we go past 4.

I guess I could see that.. we haven't always had that many safeties on the team.

With Orakpo being our only SLB this year, he would also count towards the defensive line, since we don't need a SLB very often, only on the GL and in true 4-3 situations.

There will be 10 DL players rostered, including Orakpo. If you count Alexander as DE, that means 6 DEs.

DT - Haynesworth, Griffin, Monty, Golston
DE - Daniels (LE), Alexander (LE) [the new Evans?], Carter (RE), Orakpo (RE), Jackson(RE/LE), Buzbee/Wynn/Derek Walker (LE)
LB - Fletcher, Blades, Fincher, McIntosh, Glenn, Henson/Wilson
DBs - As expected

So, that would mean DL is stacked, LB is normally rostered, like last year.

WR is going to be stacked on offense I forsee. We've always kept five. In 2005, we kept four and used our other personnel more creatively. This year, Moss/Randle El/Thomas/Kelly are roster locks. Roydell Williams seems almost necessary to have after last years debacle. But we still need that special teamer. So that means Trent Shelton vs. Marko Mitchell, loser to practice squad.

And then the one camp battle is Eddie Williams vs. Todd Yoder, for special teamer/backup fullback.

There's also a camp battle for Rock's spot, I suppose. Not that anyone is going to win it.

I would stck a new team owner, Jack Kent Cooke was the best thing the Redskins ever had. Synder is your down fall . That's why u havent won a Super Bowl since 1992. Get rid of Synder!!!!

:doh:

I would stack the o-line and WR. If the players warrant it of course. I wouldn't keep a wideout just because he's a wideout, but if it's between a safety and a WR of equal talent for example, I would keep the WR.

Kicker!

Not too sure about that. Unless 2010 is uncapped, you can count on ARE on the roster in 2010 and maybe even 2011. According to the salary cap spreadsheet, the hit to cut him in 2010 is $10.8M, and in 2011 it's over $7M.

I've addressed this several times in other threads, but the cap information for ARE (and Carter) on this site is only accurate IF the skins pick up options to extend their contracts through something like 2014. ARE and Carter both restructured their contracts after this season in such a way that after 2009, the skins have to decide to keep them and pay through the nose for them for the rest of their careers... or cut them for negligible cap charges (under 4M if memory serves me) and the players become unrestricted free agents (in a potentially uncapped year.) JLC had the full contract details on his old blog back in March.

Needless to say, ARE is not #2 WR material and never played up to expectations on special teams. Unless he has some sort of amazing-breakout year in 2009, there is no way in hell we excercise the option to bring him back for 2010 and beyond at #2WR money.