Don't Bust An Obama Supporter

Do You Want Your OTV? - Political Punch (http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/05/do-you-want-you.html) (figure someone will post it at some point)

MSNBC-Mr. saden's National Barack Channel :)
Classic :laughing2

Didn't see it on the Yahoo! News homepage either. I don't know how relevant or necessary saden's thread was, but whatever we have plenty of irrelevant and unnecessary threads in the parking lot. Can't help but think this one was created especially to counter saden's thread. But maybe that's just my jaded thinking of how "political" discussion works here.
I had not even seen Sadens thread before I started this thread and it was not until I opened his thread did I even know its context.

You forgot MSNBC. What is their wingnut name?

Do you watch any of those channels or are you just aspiring to be the next Bill O'Reilly?If there's a game on I'll watch. Also from time to time I click over just to see how the propaganda effort is going. Unfortunatley I'm not one of the 562 people in the country who watch MSNBC.

I wouldn't mind pulling in O'Reilly's bank, or having his viewership/listenership, but I don't have any experience on Inside Edition to spingboard me into the media spotlight.

If there's a game on I'll watch. Also from time to time I click over just to see how the propaganda effort is going. Unfortunatley I'm not one of the 562 people in the country who watch MSNBC.

I wouldn't mind pulling in O'Reilly's bank, or having his viewership/listenership, but I don't have any experience on Inside Edition to spingboard me into the media spotlight.

Have you noticed how the Obama supporters have not commented on the article or what Obama has done.

Have you noticed how the Obama supporters have not commented on the article or what Obama has done.Other than saden's obligatory YouTube clips, the silence from the Obama supporter camp is deafening.

EDIT: And although my original response was somewhat tongue-in-cheek, if you look at the front webpages for the four media outlets I mentioned you do not see a link to this story, unless I missed something in a quick look at all four. Obviously if you dig, you'll find it. I would say this is a pretty important story with all the transparency and accountability talk from the Obama Admin.

I'm getting old, seems like only yesterday Kevin Johnson was playing point guard for the Suns and leading them to the NBA Finals.

As for this mess, best as I can gather here it's wrong what Obama has done. And, two wrongs don't make a right, but an Obama supporter will "defend" it by citing something W did, and a W supporter will "defend" that by citing something Clinton did, Clinton-Reagan, Reagan-Carter, Carter-Nixon, Nixon-Kennedy, etc.

Other than saden's obligatory YouTube clips, the silence from the Obama supporter camp is deafening.

EDIT: And although my original response was somewhat tongue-in-cheek, if you look at the front webpages for the four media outlets I mentioned you do not see a link to this story, unless I missed something in a quick look at all four. Obviously if you dig, you'll find it. I would say this is a pretty important story with all the transparency and accountability talk from the Obama Admin.
The best part of the whole story is that he probably brook the law that he sponsord about giving 30 day notice to congress.

I'm getting old, seems like only yesterday Kevin Johnson was playing point guard for the Suns and leading them to the NBA Finals.

As for this mess, best as I can gather here it's wrong what Obama has done. And, two wrongs don't make a right, but an Obama supporter will "defend" it by citing something W did, and a W supporter will "defend" that by citing something Clinton did, Clinton-Reagan, Reagan-Carter, Carter-Nixon, Nixon-Kennedy, etc.It does seem like yesterday that Barkley could still dunk.

You're dead on about the Obama vs. Bush argument. However the media is supposed to be a watchdog, not a prom date for the Administration (D or R).

Other than saden's obligatory YouTube clips, the silence from the Obama supporter camp is deafening.

EDIT: And although my original response was somewhat tongue-in-cheek, if you look at the front webpages for the four media outlets I mentioned you do not see a link to this story, unless I missed something in a quick look at all four. Obviously if you dig, you'll find it. I would say this is a pretty important story with all the transparency and accountability talk from the Obama Admin.

When people speculate they tend to look foolish when facts come to light. Why speculate in a "they said, he said" matter when you're not empower? The allegations against (http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/Jake%27s%20Blog.pdf) this Walpin fella are serious and when the dust settles we will know the full truth. In the mean time sit back, relax and enjoy (I know, I know, it's kinda hard with a socialist who that's tearing the fabric of America is in charge).

When people speculate they tend to look foolish when facts come to light. Why speculate in a "they said, he said" matter when you're not empower? The allegations against (http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/Jake%27s%20Blog.pdf) this Walpin fella are serious and when the dust settles we will know the full truth. In the mean time sit back, relax and enjoy (I know, I know, it's kinda hard with a socialist who that's tearing the fabric of America is in charge).

I think the "he was fired because he went against a friend of Obama" is a bit of a reach...on the other hand, and maybe it's implied by the May 20 board hearing (which isn't even 30 days ag0), I don't see where the 30 day rule was honored.