The Dark Side of Marvin Harrison

If he took out a drug dealer that was actually threatening to cause problems, i don't have a huge problem with it. Not as much as if he was going out and driving drunk, or harming law abiding citizens. It's not right that he took things into his own hands like that, but this just doesn't rank that highly on my outrage meter.

edit- that was a really good read, thanks for posting SS.

If only he lived in the early colony times or the wild west. He would have been a hero.

Just watched the E-60 piece on Harrison.. It is ashame that he has gottn away with Murder! They say the quiet one's are the worst

Harrison should be in jail doing hard time. He's nothing but a hood rat.

Doesn't keep you out if you did it while still playing.
http://lashawnbarber.com/images/irvin.jpg

Being racist doesn't affect it either:
Steve Sailer's iSteve Blog: Michael Irvin on Tony Romo: (http://isteve.blogspot.com/2006/11/michael-irvin-on-tony-romo.html)

Irvin wasn't being racist and we all know Irvin is not a racist. What he saying is Romo has some color in his game. I actually found it funny. In this soceity it's OK for a black man to say those things. If a white guy says it he gets fired. It's certainly not right but that's the way it is.

Maybe , just maybe .... Al Davis hires Vinny and signs Harrison to a contract .... sarcasim

Did I miss something because I never saw where they matched the gun to the bullets.

Now that the FBI have been asked to get involved in this particular case, they won't rest until they get to the bottom of it.

I haven't been able to understand how with eye-witness testimony, ballistics test showing the shots fired came from a gun registered to Harrison, why some form of charges never were presented to a jury by the Philadelphia District Attorney's office. The Feds. are much more effecient in their investigative procedures and I look for a resolution where all the facts will be eventually revealed.

If he took out a drug dealer that was actually threatening to cause problems, i don't have a huge problem with it. Not as much as if he was going out and driving drunk, or harming law abiding citizens. It's not right that he took things into his own hands like that, but this just doesn't rank that highly on my outrage meter.

edit- that was a really good read, thanks for posting SS.

Just curious, do you think Bruce Smith is a worse person? He has been charged 3 times with DUI and been convicted once.

Bruce Smith pleads guilty to DUI | ProFootballTalk.com (http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/bruce-smith-pleads-guilty-yo-dui/)

Just curious, do you think Bruce Smith is a worse person? He has been charged 3 times with DUI and been convicted once.

Bruce Smith pleads guilty to DUI | ProFootballTalk.com (http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/bruce-smith-pleads-guilty-yo-dui/)

I can't say who's a worse or better person, i can only say how i feel about a given action. In this case, yeah, to me the three dui's are a bigger problem because they are putting innocent people in harm's way. From the sounds of that article, there weren't too many innocent folks around, since everyone involved not named marvin is either dead or in jail (the baby being the exception, and of course that is the only negative to this situation in the end).

If Marvin felt this clown was dangerous and that he wasn't going to stop being a threat, I can definitely understand his actions. Every guy here has had issues with someone that just wasn't going to leave it alone until things got physical. To me, this is just a furthering of that situation.

If he took out a drug dealer that was actually threatening to cause problems, i don't have a huge problem with it. Not as much as if he was going out and driving drunk, or harming law abiding citizens. It's not right that he took things into his own hands like that, but this just doesn't rank that highly on my outrage meter.

edit- that was a really good read, thanks for posting SS.

So you buy the "famous pieces of sh** killing not so famous pieces of sh** is no big thing" argument and the fact that he indiscriminately sprayed a street with gunfire striking innocent people does not "rank that highly on [your] outrage meter"?

Treat pieces of sh** with sh** justice and they will act accordingly.

So you buy the "famous pieces of sh** killing not so famous pieces of sh** is no big thing" argument and the fact that he indiscriminately sprayed a street with gunfire striking innocent people does not "rank that highly on [your] outrage meter"?

Treat pieces of sh** with sh** justice and they will act accordingly.

I hear you, but in reality, a person is either a positive or a negative in this world. Last time I checked, the subtraction of a negative resulted in a net gain. If you honestly expect the police to get as worked up over a drug dealer getting killed as an innocent person, I think you're dreaming. I don't have any issue at all with the way the police and DA referred to the parties involved. They're just calling them what they are. Drug dealing criminals are pieces of shit. You can't break the law your whole life and then try to hide behind it when your lifestyle catches up to you. We're all where we are because of the choices we've made, and this guy's got him killed. The only part of that story that is "outrageous" is the baby being harmed. Obviously the parents were high quality individuals since they took off not worrying about the infant in the back seat.