Have there been any wispers

zack, wtf is your problem? all you do is bitch and talk about how we should fire everyone cause they suck... need to chill man...

does he get warned for using the same word? :Smoker:

I have Mitchell back in a second, class act.

All I'd say is we freed up 2 roster spots putting them on IR. We don't need to find a new returner (Betts can do the job & Thrash is #3 WR anyway) so I think we'll pick up depth in the secondary, considering we lost 2 in quick succession recently.

All I'd say is we freed up 2 roster spots putting them on IR. We don't need to find a new returner (Betts can do the job & Thrash is #3 WR anyway) so I think we'll pick up depth in the secondary, considering we lost 2 in quick succession recently.

I agree with that. Any DBs out there?

The idea of having Mitchell back on the team is that he's a Redskins guy, he'd be a great boost for the team as a whole. I know we shouldn't need a cheerleader but look at how many of the starters who are 'heart' guys are out injured.

does he get warned for using the same word? :Smoker:
How old are you??
I would like to see B.Mitchell back. If nothing else to show the young guys what it takes to be a all pro like he was. He really was in every sense what Joe Gibbs wants out of his "true Redskins"

b. mitch was chill. he was sorta a whiner but that's one of those things that's good if he's on your team but not if he's with the 2 other NFC East ones. i don't think we need him though. he might provide a spark though so then again... we can use anything

All I'd say is we freed up 2 roster spots putting them on IR. We don't need to find a new returner (Betts can do the job & Thrash is #3 WR anyway) so I think we'll pick up depth in the secondary, considering we lost 2 in quick succession recently.

OK, I was half right! :o