MTK
04-05-2010, 09:17 AM
There are teams out there that still have a need at QB, depending on what happens in the draft there still may be a market for JC.
Is Campbell Officially Headed Out The Door?MTK 04-05-2010, 09:17 AM There are teams out there that still have a need at QB, depending on what happens in the draft there still may be a market for JC. irish 04-05-2010, 09:17 AM The problem here is JC doesn't really have any value. No one wanted him last year so what's changed? Might be better off keeping him and letting him back up DM. I agree, JC has no value so keep him for when DM gets hurt which will happen this season. CRedskinsRule 04-05-2010, 09:25 AM There are teams out there that still have a need at QB, depending on what happens in the draft there still may be a market for JC. On the, I hope this is true front, By taking McNabb out of the pool of available qb's we may in fact have increased JC's stock by a) reducing quality QB's by two(McNabb/Grossman) and b) given more impetus to the belief JC never really got a fair shake here at DC. Apparently there are 4-5 teams that are at least kicking the tires on JC. Lotus 04-05-2010, 09:30 AM Maybe JC can be traded for a decent right tackle. KI Skins Fan 04-05-2010, 09:39 AM The problem here is JC doesn't really have any value. No one wanted him last year so what's changed? Might be better off keeping him and letting him back up DM. I don't think that's true. We were probably just asking for too much. IMO, it is not good for the new direction of the team to keep JC around, regardless of what he may or may not be worth in a trade. If he can't be traded then he should be cut. We are better off turning the page at this point whether or not we get anything for him. Ruhskins 04-05-2010, 09:40 AM There are teams out there that still have a need at QB, depending on what happens in the draft there still may be a market for JC. I wonder if a trade down with our #4 and JC would be worth a lower first rounder and either a second or a third rounder. Say what you say about JC, he'd be a solid back up and a good (character) role model for a young QB. InsanePianist 04-05-2010, 09:41 AM It only takes Donovan McNabb getting hurt for Jason to have to step back in. It's not like us picking up McNabb guarantees he wouldn't take a snap next year. I wouldn't be surprised if Campbell does stay at least one more year. I'm not sure how sought after he is as a starting QB around the league. KI Skins Fan 04-05-2010, 09:46 AM Maybe JC can be traded for a decent right tackle. What a great thought! That would be beautiful! Trade JC for a veteran RT, then pick up Okung in the draft to play LT. We would be able to upgrade our OL with only one rookie starting and then we could go best player available for the rest of our draft. TheSmurfs22 04-05-2010, 09:47 AM JC is gone. He has been a classy guy throughout this time in Washington. I really am not stoked about Grossman being a backup. DBUCHANON101 04-05-2010, 09:48 AM With the Redskins' trade for Donovan McNabb, it is clear that Jason Campbell is not long for Washington, D.C. A trade seems to be a strong possibility, with two possible destinations being the two teams that just lost out on the McNabb sweepstakes: Oakland and Buffalo. The Raiders might make a little more sense seeing as how the Bills could now be turning toward the draft for a QB, hoping for Notre Dame's Jimmy Clausen to drop to them at no. 9, or perhaps nabbing a Colt McCoy or a Tim Tebow in rounds 2 or 3. Campbell would seem to be an upgrade over Bruce Gradkowski, and has the type of big arm that Al Davis likes to see in his quarterbacks. And of course, there is the chance of a team biding its time and getting into the mix later (say, a Favre-less Minnesota Vikings, if they see Campbell as an upgrade over the Tarvaris-Sage duo). Carolina is another team to keep an eye on, as the Panthers have yet to settle their QB situation, and a hardworking, less flashy guy like Campbell might be more of what they're looking for in the position (seeing as they have taken a pass on adding Michael Vick, despite his interest in playing for them). Campbell would be in a position to challenge Matt Moore, or serve as a more-than-capable backup. Don't count out the Cleveland Browns, either. They have lots of draft picks to offer, and the current depth chart of Jake Delhomme and Seneca Wallace is scaring no one. Michael Wilbon writes in today's Washington Post that while McNabb is a great fit for the Redskins, Campbell will also be better off because of the trade. It may be tough for the Redskins to find a suitable trade partner, however. Matt Mosley explains why below: From ESPN |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum