New Redskins Numbers

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7

NYCskinfan82
05-14-2010, 02:53 PM
When Spurrier was coach didn't Shane Matthews wear #9 as our QB?

It was 6 it only looked like 9 our OL couldn't stop anybody then either.

:laughing2

warpaint
05-14-2010, 02:56 PM
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dcsportsbog/floridaQBs.jpg

This makes me want to :vomit: in my mouth.

NYCskinfan82
05-14-2010, 03:02 PM
This makes me want to :vomit: in my mouth.

I just saw you :vomit: & you made me :vomit:

SmootSmack
05-14-2010, 04:00 PM
When Spurrier was coach didn't Shane Matthews wear #9 as our QB?

During training camp Matthews wore #9 and Wuerffel wore #7

skins89moss
05-16-2010, 04:31 AM
During training camp Matthews wore #9 and Wuerffel wore #7

Ok I can remember some issue about Matthew wanting to wear #9.

skins89moss
05-16-2010, 04:32 AM
It was 6 it only looked like 9 our OL couldn't stop anybody then either.

:laughing2

Yea we have been a joke over the last 10 years with Spurrier and Zorn as coaches.

SBXVII
05-18-2010, 12:33 AM
Ok, I've been having a heck of a time trying to get a name or two. I have been watching "Redskins Nation", well more like suffering through it but I do get to see video of the players practicing. In watching the camp footage they focused on the WR's at one point and there was a really, really, really small WR who ran a curl route. He looked crisp, fast and fluid. The footage was on Fri night in regards to Fridays camp during the second camp.

Then while watching last night I noticed about 4 really short WR's. I have figured out two but I'm missing two

13- Anthony Armstrong
18- Terrence Austin
15- ?
20- ?

I think #20 is who I observed in the video. I know 15 is supposed to be C.Brennan, and 20 is supposed to be Justin Tryon, but the video was definitly WR's with the QB's throwing to them so I know it must be invites who were given numbers to wear.

Ok, it's odd one quotes himself but I found out who #20 was....Brandon Banks at 5-7, 150lbs. I told you guys who ever it was was short. His drills seemed fast and crisp. I guess we'll see during camp.

Beemnseven
05-18-2010, 02:33 PM
Personally, I hope the league never gets rid of number restrictions. I HATE the fact that wideouts can now be in the teens. If we ever reach the day where a defensive linemen can be in the 20's and a kicker could have #99 I think my head would explode.

Redskin Jim
05-18-2010, 02:49 PM
Personally, I hope the league never gets rid of number restrictions. I HATE the fact that wideouts can now be in the teens. If we ever reach the day where a defensive linemen can be in the 20's and a kicker could have #99 I think my head would explode.
I feel the same way. I would hate to see a kicker in 44, or a QB in 55. Give me a break, there was a reason for this rule, (order), and it has worked well. I like that the NFL is progressive in it's thinking to improve the game and product for the consumer, but this is a good rule that doesn't need to be tweaked.

SBXVII
05-20-2010, 03:14 PM
My 2010 man crush is going to be #16 Banks, well maybe Austin also. I hear both are looking good as WR's.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum