KLHJ2
05-20-2010, 03:26 PM
I'm sure Snyder will be all over it
He has to get the team out of Fed EX first. It's sad to say but the stadium is outdated with all of these new ones popping up all over the place. If you don't have a dome or warm climate, then you need one of these new state of the art deals before the owners will consider your bid for a SuperBowl. Fed EX Field just will not cut it.
mredskins
05-20-2010, 03:41 PM
He has to get the team out of Fed EX first. It's sad to say but the stadium is outdated with all of these new ones popping up all over the place. If you don't have a dome or warm climate, then you need one of these new state of the art deals before the owners will consider your bid for a SuperBowl. Fed EX Field just will not cut it.
It can't be more or less outdated then the Super Dome and it holds the most in the NFL, I would think it would be a prime location.
Plus concerned the amount hotel space in DC area, yeah it will heavily considered.
Schneed10
05-20-2010, 03:44 PM
To make the superbowl you often have to go through cold weather cities, so the teams that make it are the ones who can weather the elements. They should win under the same conditions.
I'm of the mind that if you want to prove you're a champion, you have to prove you're the best under any conditions. Weather should not be a factor. You should be able to win in the Superdome just as much as Lambeau.
Rotate to all 32 stadiums like baseball's all star game, with the only exception being if the NFL stadium is too small.
He has to get the team out of Fed EX first. It's sad to say but the stadium is outdated with all of these new ones popping up all over the place. If you don't have a dome or warm climate, then you need one of these new state of the art deals before the owners will consider your bid for a SuperBowl. Fed EX Field just will not cut it.
I'm sure he'll get it up to speed if the carrot is there for a potential Super Bowl. The HD screens going in are probably just the beginning of the upgrades.
KLHJ2
05-20-2010, 03:57 PM
It can't be more or less outdated then the Super Dome and it holds the most in the NFL, I would think it would be a prime location.
Plus concerned the amount hotel space in DC area, yeah it will heavily considered.
See bold in original post.
mlmdub130
05-20-2010, 04:13 PM
It can't be more or less outdated then the Super Dome and it holds the most in the NFL, I would think it would be a prime location.
Plus concerned the amount hotel space in DC area, yeah it will heavily considered.
you ever driven around landover? if you have you would understand why there won't be a superbowl there, it's a f-ing dump
mredskins
05-20-2010, 04:22 PM
you ever driven around landover? if you have you would understand why there won't be a superbowl there, it's a f-ing dump
Doesn't matter most folks will be housed in DC, very few stadiums in the NFL are housed in the best part of town. If SB came here hotel rooms would be booked out to B-more and beyond.
Ruhskins
05-20-2010, 04:33 PM
you ever driven around landover? if you have you would understand why there won't be a superbowl there, it's a f-ing dump
I'm sure Detroit is not much of a pretty sight either...and while Indianapolis may be a nice city, it probably sucks in January.
Personally, I would keep the Super Bowl only in three cities: Miami, New Orleans, and San Diego.
cdskins26
05-20-2010, 04:39 PM
I'm sure he'll get it up to speed if the carrot is there for a potential Super Bowl. The HD screens going in are probably just the beginning of the upgrades.
How about parking? That would be a nice change of ways? And if snyder wanted could he put a retractable roof on?
irish
05-20-2010, 04:47 PM
I think NO should be the permanent home of the Super Bowl. The stadium is a dome so weather for players and fans wont be an issue. The Quarter has all the hotels, bars & restaurants anyone could want and the stadium is close by so most attending the game can walk from hotel to the stadium. Its a perfect setup.