***2010-2011 College Hoops Thread***

Hes just an idiot. I think what the selection committee recognizes that he and many other people don’t is that the CAA has been a really good tough conference for the last 5 years+. USC and UAB probably shouldn’t have been invited over some of those teams but VCU can make a case for themselves just as much as the other teams on that list. Something I don’t really like is that the selection committee makes their picks based off of how a team has preformed over the entire season not just how it finished. VCU finished weak in the regular season, but overall our play all year long was pretty strong (sure we did do well in the CAA tournament). Just like how BYU didn’t finish as strong as they played prior to losing a key player but they still got a pretty high seed (probably deserved now in retrospect).


Alright, can you agree the inclusion of vcu was questionable over a CU or VT? Performance in the tourney has nothing to do with it.

I'm not a fan of basketball but you don't have to be a fan to have enjoyed the games over the weekend. After maybe a few to many I really got into the FL/Butler game cheering for Butler when they were down by maybe 12. I'm probably now hooked on the sweet 16 and will watch again next year.

You do realize the tournament starts before the sweet 16 right? ;)

Alright, can you agree the inclusion of vcu was questionable over a CU or VT? Performance in the tourney has nothing to do with it.

How about at the time of at the time of tournement selection VCU RPI was 49. VT was 62 Colorado was 65.

Now apparently RPI is a guideline the committee uses in determining the Field. Takes into account strength of schedule. Bad losses and quality wins. So based on that, it can be argued they belonged

Yeah, to go along with what Chico is saying if VT or CU was included over VCU it would be just as questionable, but not as questioned since theyre bigger names from bigger conferences. VCU was easy to point a finger at. USC and UAB were probably the more appropriate teams to call out.

Ill be the first to admit the way VCU is playing right now is a little (a lot) different then how they played all year. But i still think they played well enough to be included. I didnt think they would get included because were in the CAA but i still thought we were deserving. This was the most competitive CAA ive ever seen, there are a lot of good teams in a very well coached and now very well recruited conference. I thought that Mason and ODU had a good shot at running to the Sweet 16, and thought it would be great if VCU won their first non-play in game. Now im just ecstatic.

Also to talk about VCU a little. We are probably the most athletic team in the CAA (and most other mid-majors) and have been for the last 5 years or so (since Grant took over). Our players are just a lot more "raw" then the other teams in the CAA, albeit much more physically gifted. Right now they are just coming together, so physically they can match up well with the best teams in the country (with the exception of a pre-NBA lottery picks), and have always been able to. For whatever reason they are also matching up well when it comes to just good old fashion basketball fundamentals. The last few weeks have really been the first time the Rams have been playing to their potential all year long.

I put Quake up their with Hasselbeck's kid

Matt Hasselbeck’s five-year old son Henry is a sports savant | ProFootballTalk (http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/03/24/matt-hasselbecks-five-year-old-son-henry-is-a-sports-savant/)

Pretty sweet. Didnt when Mason made it no one had the Final Four on either espn or cbs or both?

VCU and Butler may be the darlings of the Final Four, but John Calipari vs. Jim Calhoun will be must-see TV | masslive.com (http://www.masslive.com/mywideworld/index.ssf/2011/03/vcu_and_butler_may_be_the_darlings_of_the_final_fo ur_but_john_calipari_vs_jim_calhoun_will_be_must_s .html)

ESPN's March Madness bracket contest was played by roughly 5.9 million (http://kansascity.sbnation.com/kansas-jayhawks/2011/3/28/2076384/perfect-bracket-espn-com-final-four) college basketball fans this year.
And guess what? Only two people picked the VCU (http://www.vcuathletics.com/landing/index), Butler, (http://www.butlersports.com/landing/index) UConn (http://www.uconnhuskies.com/), and Kentucky (http://www.ukathletics.com/sports/m-baskbl/kty-m-baskbl-body.html) Final Four.

[QUOTE=Mattyk;790949]You do realize the tournament starts before the sweet 16 right? ;)[/QUOTE

Really.

Yeah, to go along with what Chico is saying if VT or CU was included over VCU it would be just as questionable, but not as questioned since theyre bigger names from bigger conferences. VCU was easy to point a finger at. USC and UAB were probably the more appropriate teams to call out.

Ill be the first to admit the way VCU is playing right now is a little (a lot) different then how they played all year. But i still think they played well enough to be included. I didnt think they would get included because were in the CAA but i still thought we were deserving. This was the most competitive CAA ive ever seen, there are a lot of good teams in a very well coached and now very well recruited conference. I thought that Mason and ODU had a good shot at running to the Sweet 16, and thought it would be great if VCU won their first non-play in game. Now im just ecstatic.

Also to talk about VCU a little. We are probably the most athletic team in the CAA (and most other mid-majors) and have been for the last 5 years or so (since Grant took over). Our players are just a lot more "raw" then the other teams in the CAA, albeit much more physically gifted. Right now they are just coming together, so physically they can match up well with the best teams in the country (with the exception of a pre-NBA lottery picks), and have always been able to. For whatever reason they are also matching up well when it comes to just good old fashion basketball fundamentals. The last few weeks have really been the first time the Rams have been playing to their potential all year long.


A great time to start.

Hell 2 for 4 isn't bad

2 for 4 is damn good, espically since Bulter is one of your picks. They arnt just some magically team on fire right now (like VCU), they were a team most people just selpt on.

Dan j pearlman

ESPN - Tournament Challenge - jspearlman 1 (http://games.espn.go.com/tcmen/en/entry?entryID=1079446)