D. Hall is our lone Pro Bowl selection

Is the probowl the week before the superbowl again this year? That was a horrible decisions and whoever made that call should be castrated.

Is the probowl the week before the superbowl again this year? That was a horrible decisions and whoever made that call should be castrated.

The ratings for the Pro Bowl last year were higher than ever.

Pro Bowl ratings explode | ProFootballTalk (http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/02/01/pro-bowl-ratings-explode/)

I give D Hall credit, But most upsetting is that London Fletcher gets snubbed again.

None of our DBs can tackle.Fletcher is the best we have........

Is the probowl the week before the superbowl again this year? That was a horrible decisions and whoever made that call should be castrated.


I think it is a good idea because you still somewhat care about football after the Super Bowl I am pretty much cooked when it comes to football, Ineed a break.

With that said I still never watch the Pro Bowl it is a dumb game that is totally meaningless.

I agree. McFadden was a beast this year. Snubbed

Hall is more than deserving...HTTR

Good for hall and the alternates but, the pro bowl game has lost much of it's luster in recent years. Some of the better players selected don't want to play in it because of how it conflicts with the super bowl. The scheduling of that game meets with poor timing.

Ratliff has 3.5 sacks this year, and no real pressure up the middle for the Cowboys. He's declined at least as much this year as Andre Carter did, and no one fancies Carter a pro-bowler -- though last year, he absolutely should have been.

Witten and Ware were deserving, and I don't have a huge problem with Mat McBriar being the punter for the pro bowl team, but that would make three Cowboys players already. The idea that they should get more than that is ludicrous.
I don't think Dallas deserved 5 Pro Bowlers.

But in defense of Ratliff, the guy is a very undersized NT in a 3-4. He is a converted 4-3 DE. And was a 7th round draft pick.

3.5 sacks for an undersized NT who is constantly fighting off double teams is pretty good IMO.

I don't think Dallas deserved 5 Pro Bowlers.

But in defense of Ratliff, the guy is a very undersized NT in a 3-4. He is a converted 4-3 DE. And was a 7th round draft pick.

3.5 sacks for an undersized NT who is constantly fighting off double teams is pretty good IMO.

You not making a defense for Ratliff your making an excuse for him.