SirClintonPortis
09-04-2011, 06:19 PM
This signing probably has a lot to do with trying to find a way to beat the redskins zone blocking scheme. I think the redskins offense may have the NFC east worried. And mainly because of how the line has been performing in the preseason.
I think their LG position issue is far from resolved, and they just simply might not be comfy with what they have. They were having a competition at that position in the preseason.
artmonkforhallofamein07
09-04-2011, 06:21 PM
Yep, I agree Sir CP. We should have swapped players and been done with it. It was the VC show back then, nuff said. I am just glad we didn't give them a first as well. lol
VegasSkinsFan
09-04-2011, 09:53 PM
Well, wasn't said all-pro CB set on leaving us to test the market anyway?
Also, said RB did have some ridiculously efficient numbers to demand a high price tag.
That said, the trade should have been just the exchange of the players. The draft pick was highly unnecessary.
There is a lot of truth here. I hated that trade for so many reasons, mostly because we traded a hard to find commodity for an easy to find commodity. The saying RBs are interchangeable is very true.
I think we would have lost Champ anyway unless we gave him a crazy contract and we at least got something in return, I just cringe when I hear that.
This signing probably has a lot to do with trying to find a way to beat the redskins zone blocking scheme. I think the redskins offense may have the NFC east worried. And mainly because of how the line has been performing in the preseason.
How is signing Dock going to help the Cowboys on D?
artmonkforhallofamein07
09-04-2011, 10:09 PM
Its not. DD cant help the Cowboys with knowing what we are doing.
warriorzpath
09-04-2011, 11:51 PM
How is signing Dock going to help the Cowboys on D?
Because he spent the entire 2010 season in the redskins blocking scheme. Albeit as a backup, but he still has first hand recent knowledge of it.
12thMan
09-04-2011, 11:58 PM
Because he spent the entire 2010 season in the redskins blocking scheme. Albeit as a backup, but he still has first hand recent knowledge of it.
That don't mean squat. The Cowboys have plenty of film on the Redskins, Dockery ain't changing how they game plan for the Skins.
My gut tells me that a lot of teams will be keeping an eye on our opening game to see how well Hightower performs in the new scheme.
mlmpetert
09-05-2011, 12:04 AM
I know its not going to happen..... but the Giants cut Ryan Perrilloux and placed in on their PS. If we wanted to put a third qb on the roster hed be my pick
warriorzpath
09-05-2011, 12:13 AM
That don't mean squat. The Cowboys have plenty of film on the Redskins, Dockery ain't changing how they game plan for the Skins.
My gut tells me that a lot of teams will be keeping an eye on our opening game to see how well Hightower performs in the new scheme.
Of course all the teams on the redskins schedule are going to be watching closely. But that's ONLY YOUR opinion with Dockery. I think they are already worried this early with the redskins line that they would want all of competive advantage they can get, especially considering that they have a new defensive coach. And what better way of getting knowledge of a scheme by signing someone that has been studying and practicing it firsthand. And as a fallback reason and if this doesn't net them much, Dockery seems to be a decent backup.
Because he spent the entire 2010 season in the redskins blocking scheme. Albeit as a backup, but he still has first hand recent knowledge of it.
Yeah but the ZBS isn't anything new to the NFL, there's plenty of game tape for any team to study. It all comes down to execution.