Is it his year?

I would take Favre with no arms over Brunell! LOL Ouch! I guess that was a little rough!

No he completely deserved it. HE'S one of the main reasons I have to pay out the ass to park at FedEx.

At least Clinton is earning his keep (for the most part).

Speaking of earning their keep... anyone heard about Pierce recently? I've heard a contract has been close.

Slate.com had a great article this week about Favre and the difference between his stats and his image in the media. I know that he's not responsible for how the media lionizes him as a "good ol' guy" just wanting to play football, but I've detected a growing weariness from some football fans over it. You look at his last several playoff games and you get this:
1. 2005- 4 picks at home vs. the Vikings.
2. 2004- one win, and then bad passes vs. the Eagles (I'll give him a big pass on that one- 4th and 27 anybody?)
3. 2002- loses to Falcons, at home, 1st ever playoff loss at Lambeau.
4. 2001- Mulitiple INTs vs. the Rams.
I love the guy, he's fun to watch, but I fear he's at the Dan Marino-late stages of his career-thinks he can force the ball into anything-stage of his career. The Packers need a QB plan now and Favre needs to wind back and play within his talents. Still would love to see him over Brunell though :cool-smil

Had Favre not lost the way he did, I'd say he's done. He'll play one more season and try to end in a lambeau home win which they miss the playoffs, or a good playoff performance by him.

Favre still threw for over 4000 yards this year and 30 TD's, he's not in the late career Marino stage just yet.

I think the Packers tend to lean on him too much come playoff time. They really need to upgrade the defense.

I'll take a 50 yr old Favre before I take Brunell..

Great line, P!