Gardner to Tampa?

Pages : [1] 2 3 4

MTK
01-16-2005, 12:05 PM
http://bucs.tbo.com/bucs/MGBRHOEI04E.html

TAMPA - The Bucs are pretty excited about this year's draft, and with 11 picks - including four in the top 100 - they should be.


The 11 picks are the most the Bucs have had since 1993, but no one should be surprised if they try to parlay at least one of those picks into something other than an untried prospect.

With picks in each of the first five rounds and two each in the sixth and seventh, the Bucs appear to have the arsenal and flexibility to make a trade for a proven NFL commodity.

All they need is a willing partner, and one already might have surfaced in the Washington Redskins.

The Redskins have made it clear in recent weeks they are looking to part with receiver Rod Gardner. They reportedly are seeking a middle-round pick in return, and the Bucs have plenty of those.

The Bucs also have a need for a player of Gardner's talents. Though he has been inconsistent in terms of production, Gardner has good hands and the speed to stretch defenses.

He might not be an ideal fit in Coach Jon Gruden's system, because he tends to run sloppy short and intermediate routes, but he would be an upgrade over Tim Brown and Charles Lee.

The Bucs' lone concern in making such a trade might be salary. Gardner is slated to make $1.45 million next season, but that probably will prove to be less than they would have to pay for Raiders projected free agent Jerry Porter. Besides, it's beginning to look as though Porter won't hit the market. The Raiders already have made him an offer, and Porter is talking as if he doesn't want to leave Oakland.

celts32
01-16-2005, 12:34 PM
Whoever wrote that says Gardner has good hands!!*%$#&$

LongTimeSkinsFan
01-16-2005, 12:58 PM
Whoever wrote that says Gardner has good hands!!*%$#&$

Sssssssshhhhhhhhushh! Let em believe that and we might just be able to get a good deal for him!

aehs77
01-16-2005, 01:27 PM
hopefully they dont investigate that too much.

SmootSmack
01-16-2005, 01:35 PM
I'm going to agree with this guy. Gardner has made some dynamite catches so I don't think his hands are necessarily an issue.

The problem is that he seems to lose focus on the easy throws. Why that is I don't know, but as many of us said many times here-throw it to Gardner and he drops it, throw it over his head and to his left with two defenders on him and he'll grab it one-handed.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha
01-16-2005, 02:07 PM
I'd like to see a 3rd rounder for him. Otherwise, I'd say keep him.

Duffman003
01-16-2005, 03:11 PM
All you have to do with Gardner is throw it to a spot where he shouldn't catch it, then he will make a circus catch. But if you throw it right on the numbers he will get confused and it will bobble out of his hands.

Gmanc711
01-16-2005, 03:16 PM
I'd like to see a 3rd rounder for him. Otherwise, I'd say keep him.

I'll buy that. If we keep him for one more season, and then just let him walk for free, it wont bother me. For some reason, I have a feeling he's going to have a good year next season, just because its a contract year. If we can get a 3rd or maybe even a low 4th, I'd say take it. Otherwise, just let him fart around as our 3rd wideout at move on.

SKINSnCANES
01-16-2005, 03:37 PM
A third would be the least that I would want for him, preferably a second. Hes cheap for one more year, and its a contract year. He could be a great third receiver, and if we could get someone else to be teh number two. Last thing I want is for us to get rid of him for nothing then have him blow up and put up huge numbers, he is capable of it, hes a good mold for a receiver

skinsguy
01-16-2005, 05:56 PM
Yeah, if the Skins can score at least a third rounder, then ditch Gardner....

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum