Radical AIDS research funded in Canada [Archive] - Page 2

djnemo65

12-05-2011, 04:32 PM

The cure is very easy. Don't go banging nasty sluts and don't take it up the a$$.

Just for the record, it's incredibly difficult to contract HIV through regular vaginal intercourse. Incredibly difficult, i.e. estimates range from like less than 10 percent chance to basically impossible without an open sore. From an HIV-perspective taking it up the ass is different, very high contraction risk, and there are additionally plenty of good non-aids-related reasons to not bang nasty sluts. (There are also arguably lots of good reasons to bang nasty sluts, but that's a different thread.) But anyway, people seem to think that if they have unprotected sex with an HIV-positive opposite sex member they are likely to contract HIV, and that's just not the case.

SolidSnake84

12-05-2011, 08:17 PM

I'm sorry guys. I'm just not that educated in medicine and HIV science. All I know is that i know of two people personally who were told they had HIV, and it ended up being a "false positive". One of them was a guy i used to work with, and the other was my dad's best friend. It seems like the testing is not really a safe bet.

I know my post on this thread didn't sound like it, but I don't truly believe in government conspiracys or something like that, lots of people over the years have told me that the government would try to keep the cure private because of the money they make off the so called treatments.

Again, forgive me.


	Commanders Post at The Warpath > Off-Topic Discussion > Parking Lot > Radical AIDS research funded in Canada Log in Radical AIDS research funded in Canada Pages : 1 [2] djnemo65 12-05-2011, 04:32 PM The cure is very easy. Don't go banging nasty sluts and don't take it up the a$$. Just for the record, it's incredibly difficult to contract HIV through regular vaginal intercourse. Incredibly difficult, i.e. estimates range from like less than 10 percent chance to basically impossible without an open sore. From an HIV-perspective taking it up the ass is different, very high contraction risk, and there are additionally plenty of good non-aids-related reasons to not bang nasty sluts. (There are also arguably lots of good reasons to bang nasty sluts, but that's a different thread.) But anyway, people seem to think that if they have unprotected sex with an HIV-positive opposite sex member they are likely to contract HIV, and that's just not the case. SolidSnake84 12-05-2011, 08:17 PM I'm sorry guys. I'm just not that educated in medicine and HIV science. All I know is that i know of two people personally who were told they had HIV, and it ended up being a "false positive". One of them was a guy i used to work with, and the other was my dad's best friend. It seems like the testing is not really a safe bet. I know my post on this thread didn't sound like it, but I don't truly believe in government conspiracys or something like that, lots of people over the years have told me that the government would try to keep the cure private because of the money they make off the so called treatments. Again, forgive me.