Daseal
02-21-2005, 12:29 PM
A lot of players can say the right things and not mean them. Actions speak louder than words, and until his name is on that contract let's not speculate 8)
Positives & Negatives: Coles' releaseDaseal 02-21-2005, 12:29 PM A lot of players can say the right things and not mean them. Actions speak louder than words, and until his name is on that contract let's not speculate 8) firstdown 02-21-2005, 12:52 PM This is just a thought I had.Maybe he was unhappy last season and the only reason he stayed was his toe injury. Toward the end of this season he took a cortisone shot in his toe which he said helped and elected not to operate.An operation would hurt him big time as a free agent. Now that his toe feels better he wants out because now can past other teams physicals and can run a fast 40. SKINSnCANES 02-21-2005, 01:05 PM Positive: I understand that Coles had a finger injury this past season, but didn't anyone else feel he was dropping an alarmingly high number of catchable balls? If he had been a few inches taller I would have sworn he was Gardner on some of those plays. Coles has been one of my favorite players over the past few seasons, but he is far from healthy and seemingly on the decline. He was supposed to stretch the field, but his toe hasn't allowed him to maintain the same speed that got us all so excited when he was brought here initially. I'll be sad to see him go, but I don't believe he would have been a #1 receiver on many other teams the way he played last season. welcome to the board. GoSkins! 02-21-2005, 01:05 PM Well, we have heard what Coles wants, and what Gibbs will let happen. What we don't know yet is what Snyder is going to do. I bet that Snyder brokers some kind of deal to get us a new receiving threat using Coles as the trade. I bet phones are going off all over the NFL over this development. Here is a senario... We agree to let Coles buy back his contract and he allows us to seek the trade and franchise him. This way, he can still seek the team he wants, but he is then obligated to make them provide some compensation for him. I'll be very surprised to just see him leave without getting anything for him. It just doesn't ever seem to work that way in the NFL. If he does, I would have to believe that the Skins think his injury will never allow him to be worth his salary. dirtbag2112 02-21-2005, 01:10 PM With the exception of 1 or 2 games last season, we were right there in every one. Thanks mostly to our defense, we SHOULD have beaten devision rivals such as Dallas and Philly. Despite a new staff and totally new system, we were simply victims of circumstance. ie: Injury bug, horrendous officiating and the 1 mistake that was Brunell. Hopefully this year these problems will be put behind us including any players who model themselves after "TO". MTK 02-21-2005, 01:12 PM Well, we have heard what Coles wants, and what Gibbs will let happen. What we don't know yet is what Snyder is going to do. I bet that Snyder brokers some kind of deal to get us a new receiving threat using Coles as the trade. I bet phones are going off all over the NFL over this development. Here is a senario... We agree to let Coles buy back his contract and he allows us to seek the trade and franchise him. This way, he can still seek the team he wants, but he is then obligated to make them provide some compensation for him. I'll be very surprised to just see him leave without getting anything for him. It just doesn't ever seem to work that way in the NFL. If he does, I would have to believe that the Skins think his injury will never allow him to be worth his salary. Is such a scenario even possible though? Will the NFL allow something like that? That's the real question. Schneed10 02-21-2005, 01:21 PM You can't slap the franchise tag on a player unless he is a free agent. If you grant a player his outright release from the contract, you also cannot slap the franchise tag on him. Franchising him is impossible. Secondly, trading him will make his cap hit about $10 million this year, which is impossible to absorb. Coles won't give back the signing bonus unless he gets the opportunity to become a free agent, so we'll get no help on the cap hit. A trade is, therefore, impossible. TheMalcolmConnection 02-21-2005, 01:24 PM :vomit-smi That's all I have to say. Balmerskinsfan 02-21-2005, 01:28 PM This sucks. Why are we getting nothing for Coles? Don't you think we could wrangel some sort of trade for him? We wouldn't get value, but maybe something. I hate to just let a guy like Coles go, especially w/the hit the salary cap will take. TheMalcolmConnection 02-21-2005, 01:29 PM The hit would be even more outrageous if we trade him (I think.) |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum