Ravens showing interest in McCants?

Pages : 1 [2]

offiss
03-22-2004, 02:14 AM
Personally I think it would have to a fairly considerable amount of money for Mcants to move on, he is a smart guy who I think will see the advantages playing in a gibb's system, as well he is as exited as we are that gibb's is back.

SkinsRock
03-22-2004, 10:01 AM
I want McCants to stay a Redskin. But if there is another team that would be very tempting to him, I'd guess that it would be Baltimore, considering that he grew up in between DC and B-more. Besides money, he'd have to weigh (possibly) more playing time verses playing for Gibbs. I'd prefer playing for a HOF coach.

Carnage
03-22-2004, 02:58 PM
We still got Taylor Jacobs on contract, and with Spurrier gone, three should be enough.

raleighskinsfan
03-22-2004, 04:34 PM
What round did we draft McCants? If he's restricted and signs with Baltimore, we'd get a draft pick as compensation- does anyone know what round he was drafted, and if we would get that pick this year or next year?
I love McCants, especially in the Red Zone. He always ends up on the other teams 3rd corner or safety and beats them every time with his size, hands and jumping ability. I hope we keep him, but I hope we don't have to pay a ridiculous amount to retain him...

joecrisp
03-22-2004, 06:43 PM
What round did we draft McCants? If he's restricted and signs with Baltimore, we'd get a draft pick as compensation- does anyone know what round he was drafted, and if we would get that pick this year or next year?
I love McCants, especially in the Red Zone. He always ends up on the other teams 3rd corner or safety and beats them every time with his size, hands and jumping ability. I hope we keep him, but I hope we don't have to pay a ridiculous amount to retain him...
McCants was a 5th rounder in 2001. That would give us a scintillating TWO fifth rounders in April, in addition to our first rounder. But two is better than one, I guess.

dieselhog
03-23-2004, 05:59 AM
It won't take us long to make two 5th rounders disappear....

Shane
03-23-2004, 08:48 AM
I think McCants might want to play for a team where he would have a much more prominent role, and we do have a bit of a logjam at WR right now. If McCants stays, Taylor Jacobs may not have a lot of room to get on the field to show what he can do.

And its true, I am already salivating about another "scintillating" 5th round draft choice. I can see the cover of Sports Illustrated now - a big number 5, and the headline "With two 5th round picks, can the Redskins be stopped?"

SkinsRock
03-23-2004, 09:37 AM
Sign Darnerian to a new multi-year deal, and trade Gardner to Baltimore for a 3rd rounder (or the best offer we can get). Either of them will flourish under Gibbs in the "Monk" type role, and McCants will be cheaper, even with a new deal. Plus, this is the last year of Gardner's contract, so he may be gone next year anyway....

AnonEmouse
03-23-2004, 09:56 AM
You have a point. However, I think all this depends on Jacobs. If he shows through in mini camp, then JG may be OK with losing McCants or Gardner. If not, then I suspect we may resign McCants and restructure Gardner soon.

sportscurmudgeon
03-23-2004, 01:45 PM
Skinsrock:

Put yourself in the position of the GM for the Ravens.

You can sign McCants to the contract you negotiate with him which is obviously to your liking and give up a 5th round pick - - - OR - - -

You can give up a 3rd round pick and take Gardner with whatever contract he signed with the skins previously.


Which would you do if you were the Ravens' GM? That's why trading Gardner there ain't gonna happen. By the way, if I had to pick either Gardner or McCants in a draft and give up nothing to get either one, I'd probably take McCants. It would be close...


Redskins8588:

Do yourself a favor and believe NOTHING on redskins.com except for statistical data such as where so-and-so went to school or what is the date of birth for Joe Flabeetz. The rest of the stuff there just spin control pumped out by the Skins' PR Department. If Adolf Hitler played for the Redskins, they'd tell you he is merely a tough competitor who likes to run roughshod over his competition.

The ONLY time you will hear anything negative about a Skins' player from the PR Department is when they are beginning to set the stage to release a player or not to re-sign him in the off-season. Remember Brian Mitchell? About six weeks before the Skins' decided to let him go, there were strange whispers about him being a "locker room problem" and an "abrasive personality" and that he had "lost a step". Amazing...

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum