|
|
Ok Skinforlife28, I'm sure all the teams that passed up on Moss, the year he was drafted said the same thing, I mean you trying to tell me Mark Clayton is better than Mike Williams, and who remember the other WR drafted the Year Randy Moss was, yea that's what I thought, If Minnesota takes Williams and he has a break out year, then I'll see if your side GM ability worked, and If we go 6-10, because we think were NE, were not, Skinforlife or Scamforlife, why wouldn't Minnesota take Williams they can imporve in FA.....just don't respond unless you know facts, Clayton not even a Top 3 receivers in the draft, not even
jrocx69 02-25-2005, 01:23 PM Ok Skinforlife28, I'm sure all the teams that passed up on Moss, the year he was drafted said the same thing, I mean you trying to tell me Mark Clayton is better than Mike Williams, and who remember the other WR drafted the Year Randy Moss was, yea that's what I thought, If Minnesota takes Williams and he has a break out year, then I'll see if your side GM ability worked, and If we go 6-10, because we think were NE, were not, Skinforlife or Scamforlife, why wouldn't Minnesota take Williams they can imporve in FA.....just don't respond unless you know facts, Clayton not even a Top 3 receivers in the draft, not even
:vomit-smi your post
and how do you know clayton wont dominate? ... moron, you dont know
do you remember coles being drafted in the third round, or maybe boldin selected 54th overall (late second round if you dont know) you dont know what the hell you are talking about. it could easily be chris henry from west virginia that dominates the rookie class wr's, and im willing to be he gets drafted in the 3rd round, maybe late second
wow you are a ....... :vomit-smi your post
SmootSmack 02-25-2005, 02:06 PM easy fellas
Ok Skinforlife28, I'm sure all the teams that passed up on Moss, the year he was drafted said the same thing, I mean you trying to tell me Mark Clayton is better than Mike Williams, and who remember the other WR drafted the Year Randy Moss was, yea that's what I thought, If Minnesota takes Williams and he has a break out year, then I'll see if your side GM ability worked, and If we go 6-10, because we think were NE, were not, Skinforlife or Scamforlife, why wouldn't Minnesota take Williams they can imporve in FA.....just don't respond unless you know facts, Clayton not even a Top 3 receivers in the draft, not even Well the year that Randy got drafted was a weak WR draft. Only notables to come out were Dyson, Hines Ward, and Az Hakim. So the Vikings needed a WR and they got the best one on the board, no doubt. But to compare a player to Moss is absurd. Williams might not be the 2nd comming of any great recievers and Mark Clayton truly is not a bad pick. Question really here is character, for that alone we are lucky we do not have Randy Moss. Clayton is a top 3 WR. It goes Williams then Edwards or visa versa then Clayton. Who else is ahead of these 3 at WR, in anybodies profiles. Please let us see where you have found these facts. KNOW YOUR FACTS DUDE!!! And don't call people names as that is truly Moss-like.
SmootSmack 03-01-2005, 08:36 PM Warren is apparently going to Denver for a 4th round pick
SKINSnCANES 03-01-2005, 08:38 PM denver is royally messing up therir dline. Apparently they want to go to 3-4 becuase its cheaper to sign linebackers, and according to an article on espn Denver has never been able to keep a dline together for 100 years
terps and skins 03-01-2005, 09:11 PM i'd much rather have a defensive end then a dtackle
|