Chris Cooley

Paul has only been targeted four times in the past 5 games, how is that taking passes away from anyone? Please explained in a coherent way with facts. Thanks.

(Keep in mind that I don't like Paul)

Can I just read your post back hehe? He's been targeted four times. One was a gimme TD on blown coverage. That leaves three that I presume were drops or catches that didn't go for any yardage. Do you have more on this, Sherlock?

You didn't have (sarcasm) in there, so I assume you're serious? WTF...I'm not talking conspiracy. What are you talking about? It's not a conspiracy when the coaches decide to leave a player out of the passing game. It could be a mistake, especially when you keep going back to a different player who doesn't execute. I thought that's what we're discussing here, no?

How is targeting Niles Paul FOUR times in the last five games going to a player that doesn't execute. Please explain.

he's all of a sudden not in this regime's plans even if he is still capable of contributing a great deal.

Again I'll ask. What basis do you have to think at this point he is capable of doing more than he currently is? I mean other than Goat's imaginations?

You obviously don't read your own stuff.

Boom.

Roasted

You obviously don't read your own stuff.

Boom.

Actually, I gotta say there's been little substance thrown my way here, you included. I posted Cooley's stats and referenced them. The counter has been nonsense, and some stupidity about a conspiracy that you or someone else brought up.

Paul gets what, maybe 1-2 looks a game? Who cares.

They obviously feel more comfortable with Cooley blocking. Or maybe they've had some plays with him involved in the passing game and things just haven't gone his way for whatever reason.

Why does there always have to be some sort of conspiracy with you?

You didn't have (sarcasm) in there, so I assume you're serious? WTF...I'm not talking conspiracy. What are you talking about? It's not a conspiracy when the coaches decide to leave a player out of the passing game. It could be a mistake, especially when you keep going back to a different player who doesn't execute. I thought that's what we're discussing here, no?

You obviously think CC should be more involved, at least more than Paul. You can't seem to fathom why Paul is more involved than Cooley. It's a Mike thing with coaches/players. Sounds like conspiracy talk to me, especially with your track record around here.

How is targeting Niles Paul FOUR times in the last five games going to a player that doesn't execute. Please explain.

It isn't but Goat doesn't like Shanny so he only sees what he wants to see. Shanny could say 2+2=4 and Goat would argue with him about it.

You obviously think CC should be more involved, at least more than Paul. You can't seem to fathom why Paul is more involved than Cooley. It's a Mike thing with coaches/players. Sounds like conspiracy talk to me, especially with your track record around here.

I didn't know having 4 balls thrown your way in the past 5 games counted as being involved.

You didn't have (sarcasm) in there, so I assume you're serious? WTF...I'm not talking conspiracy. What are you talking about? It's not a conspiracy when the coaches decide to leave a player out of the passing game. It could be a mistake, especially when you keep going back to a different player who doesn't execute. I thought that's what we're discussing here, no?

How is targeting Niles Paul FOUR times in the last five games going to a player that doesn't execute. Please explain.

Again, you've answered your own question.

A more important question is why did he even get those four opportunities, given the preceding games? All season it's been missed blocks (some of which put RG on the ground), dropped passes, stutter steps after the one or two catches.

I mean the real question is why Paul is on the field at all, let alone (still) getting passes thrown his way, right?

i would like smoot to print this thread, and read it aloud to shanny and cooley, on camera