offiss
03-31-2005, 02:10 PM
true none of us know what is gonna happen but it is fun to speculate. i just thought that i would see they said about vincent on ESPN INSIDER-
(6'4http://espn-att.starwave.com/i/nfl/trans/3_4.gif", 241, 4.51) 39 inch leap
They said that he is from a small school and has GREAT top end speed and exeptional size. He has been productive, and can jump and has long arms to snag the ball, he is stronger than most DBs and will outmuscle them.Reliable hands and does a good job catching the ball even if it is not thrown very well, gives effort at blocker but has the size and strength to be dominant if his skill is taken advantage of.
Very bad acceleration, no burst or sharp cuts, he isn't good at running routes, he slows down when he puts the moves on and needs to keep his speed better (CP will teach him that!), Good PR in college but not good enough for nfl w/o elusiveness (SM aka small man will teach him that)
"He had 66 receptions for 1,462 yards and 21 touchdowns as a junior in 2003 and 80 receptions for 1,382 yards and 11 TD's as a senior in 2004" 17.3yards/avg and 22.2y/avg in 2003
NOT BAD!!
Overall rank 71points and position rank of 15
the rank edwards first then, mike williams, williamson, clayton, then roddy white at 5th, reggie brown, parrish, chris henry,jerome mathis(fast mo fo),fred gibson, terrance murphey, matt jones, and courtney roby, and then mark bradley then our main man VJ which may mean he could be around a while possible 3rd rounder, over looked?:eek:
The 1 problem I have with that evaluation is, when I watched him at the combine he cut better than Williams he was impressive for a man of his size, that is a big thing with how I evaluate a WR, top end speed is not as important as the ability to cut and seperate, quickness gets you open speed will get you the deep passes, lets face it neither none of the big recievers will ever have the quickness of the smaller but do they make up for it with their long arms and body positioning? I think both Jackson and William's will. but in taking Jackson we get a very similar player and a CB it's a 2 for 1 situation I say we go for both rather than Williams.
let me add a foot note, Jackson looked very aggressive at the combine I like a guy who is fighting for all he's worth on every play they almost always find a way to succeed.
(6'4http://espn-att.starwave.com/i/nfl/trans/3_4.gif", 241, 4.51) 39 inch leap
They said that he is from a small school and has GREAT top end speed and exeptional size. He has been productive, and can jump and has long arms to snag the ball, he is stronger than most DBs and will outmuscle them.Reliable hands and does a good job catching the ball even if it is not thrown very well, gives effort at blocker but has the size and strength to be dominant if his skill is taken advantage of.
Very bad acceleration, no burst or sharp cuts, he isn't good at running routes, he slows down when he puts the moves on and needs to keep his speed better (CP will teach him that!), Good PR in college but not good enough for nfl w/o elusiveness (SM aka small man will teach him that)
"He had 66 receptions for 1,462 yards and 21 touchdowns as a junior in 2003 and 80 receptions for 1,382 yards and 11 TD's as a senior in 2004" 17.3yards/avg and 22.2y/avg in 2003
NOT BAD!!
Overall rank 71points and position rank of 15
the rank edwards first then, mike williams, williamson, clayton, then roddy white at 5th, reggie brown, parrish, chris henry,jerome mathis(fast mo fo),fred gibson, terrance murphey, matt jones, and courtney roby, and then mark bradley then our main man VJ which may mean he could be around a while possible 3rd rounder, over looked?:eek:
The 1 problem I have with that evaluation is, when I watched him at the combine he cut better than Williams he was impressive for a man of his size, that is a big thing with how I evaluate a WR, top end speed is not as important as the ability to cut and seperate, quickness gets you open speed will get you the deep passes, lets face it neither none of the big recievers will ever have the quickness of the smaller but do they make up for it with their long arms and body positioning? I think both Jackson and William's will. but in taking Jackson we get a very similar player and a CB it's a 2 for 1 situation I say we go for both rather than Williams.
let me add a foot note, Jackson looked very aggressive at the combine I like a guy who is fighting for all he's worth on every play they almost always find a way to succeed.