That Guy
03-11-2014, 01:07 PM
and anyone that thinks garcon is getting cut next year is some kind of crazy. unless you're planning on lead-piping his knee or some such.
WR Andre Roberts has agreed to deal with RedskinsThat Guy 03-11-2014, 01:07 PM and anyone that thinks garcon is getting cut next year is some kind of crazy. unless you're planning on lead-piping his knee or some such. GTripp0012 03-11-2014, 01:17 PM and anyone that thinks garcon is getting cut next year is some kind of crazy. unless you're planning on lead-piping his knee or some such.Or understand how backloaded deals affect the cap. GTripp0012 03-11-2014, 01:19 PM Really? What would make you think our only weapon Garcon will be cut in a year? If that comes off a certain way its not im just curious.There's a new coaching staff, who isn't going to hold onto a player just to hold onto a player. If you can get the same production for half the price, they'll do it. skinsfaninok 03-11-2014, 01:20 PM Yeah this is just another guy imo Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk Chico23231 03-11-2014, 01:24 PM Or understand how backloaded deals affect the cap. yeah, its more cap related than performance related. Gruden is a fan, if Garcon plays well, you can always iron out a backloaded deal. CRedskinsRule 03-11-2014, 01:49 PM Or understand how backloaded deals affect the cap. His deal isn't a cap killer, nor is it a backloaded deal in the sense of skyrocketing cap charges. His base salary, dead cap and cap savings per year of his deal is : Year 2012 $2,100,000 $13,100,000 ($8,400,000) 2013 $5,600,000 $8,800,000 ($615,625) 2014 $7,100,000 $6,600,000 $3,100,000 2015 $7,100,000 $4,400,000 $5,300,000 2016 $7,600,000 $2,200,000 $8,000,000 That's a consistent base salary, which indicates a team is looking to count on him, and not be forced into a decision based on outrageous base or cap numbers. GTripp0012 03-11-2014, 01:56 PM His deal isn't a cap killer, nor is it a backloaded deal in the sense of skyrocketing cap charges. His base salary, dead cap and cap savings per year of his deal is : Year 2012 $2,100,000 $13,100,000 ($8,400,000) 2013 $5,600,000 $8,800,000 ($615,625) 2014 $7,100,000 $6,600,000 $3,100,000 2015 $7,100,000 $4,400,000 $5,300,000 2016 $7,600,000 $2,200,000 $8,000,000 That's a consistent base salary, which indicates a team is looking to count on him, and not be forced into a decision based on outrageous base or cap numbers.Can save $5.3 million to release or $7.5 million with a post June 1 designation. $5 MM AAV can get you a better receiver than Garcon on the open market in most years. Plus: they're going to draft someone from a loaded WR class who is going to need someone to get released from the rotation in order to get increased reps. It's a no brainer. CRedskinsRule 03-11-2014, 01:58 PM Glad you are not in FO Gtripp. I am going to walk away. have a great day. GTripp0012 03-11-2014, 01:59 PM yeah, its more cap related than performance related. Gruden is a fan, if Garcon plays well, you can always iron out a backloaded deal.If Gruden is a fan. Gruden came from Cincinnati, where he had AJ Green, Marvin Jones, Mohammad Sanu, and Andrew Hawkins. He's going to try to put something similar together here, and that gets a lot easier when Garcon isn't hogging $9 million on the cap. He's a necessary part of this year's roster, so I'm not suggesting that Gruden can't wait to get Garcon out of town. I just think the offense is going to be Jordan Reed-centric because...well, obviously. Chico23231 03-11-2014, 02:07 PM Well if Gruden continues to be a fan. He's stated he showed film of Garcon to his receivers and has stated such. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum